Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-3 matches up against the WG-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Pentax WG-1
E-3 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-3
WG-1 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 36 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-1
E-3 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 has exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Pentax WG-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-3 versus the WG-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14cb8/14cb8862e8a5f9a3104082b83af884fd70807e3c" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and WG-1 is 56 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cf00/7cf009e9c7cc4f464274819e0a98db56aa28fc16" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and WG-1.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Pentax WG-1 will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7df15/7df1546b0538999ac1c30099225f3511bbb63cd5" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78eaa/78eaa99e14144179b7f1caeecbdd589de8d27af9" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $670 | $350 |