Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX350
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48


62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released December 2016

Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX350: A Detailed Comparison for the Modern Photographer
Choosing the right camera is a pivotal step in your photography journey. Whether you're a seasoned pro or a passionate enthusiast, understanding how different cameras perform across various real-world scenarios helps you make an investment that truly fits your creative vision. Today, we'll dive deep into comparing the Olympus E-3, a mid-sized professional DSLR from 2008, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350, a versatile bridge superzoom from 2016. Both cameras serve vastly different user profiles and photography disciplines - yet each has compelling features worthy of attention.
Drawing on extensive hands-on testing and years of evaluating cameras with diverse sensor technologies, autofocus systems, controls, and lens ecosystems, we'll unpack what these models offer. By the end of this comprehensive 2500-word review, you’ll gain a clear understanding of their core strengths, shortcomings, and the ideal user niches for each one.
Designing Your Experience: Size, Build, and Handling
Starting with physicality - the first tactile impression always shapes your shooting experience.
-
Olympus E-3: This DSLR is a robust mid-sized body measuring 142 x 116 x 75 mm and weighing around 890 grams. It features professional-grade weather sealing, a pentaprism optical viewfinder offering a 100% viewing area, and a fully articulated 2.5-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution.
-
Sony HX350: The bridge-style body (130 x 93 x 103 mm, 652 grams) is more compact and lightweight, designed around a built-in 50x zoom lens. It includes a tilting 3-inch LCD with a significantly higher 922k-dot resolution and an electronic viewfinder (EVF) at 202k dots.
Handling Highlights:
-
The E-3 boasts a classic DSLR layout with a substantial grip, direct access dials, and customizable buttons catering to fast-paced professional workflows.
-
The HX350, while portable, adopts a superzoom form factor with simplified controls but is still equipped for manual exposure. It is less ergonomic for heavy use but excels in travel-friendly convenience.
We photographed both side-by-side, noting the E-3's heft offers reassuring stability, while the HX350’s compact silhouette suits street, travel, and casual shooting better.
Sensors and Image Quality: Making Pixels Count
This is where the cameras’ nature dramatically diverge.
Feature | Olympus E-3 | Sony HX350 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | Four Thirds CMOS | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size | 17.3 x 13 mm (224.9 mm²) | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) |
Resolution | 10 MP (3648 x 2736) | 20 MP (5184 x 3456) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 3200 (boost to 12800) |
Anti-Alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Aspect Ratios | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 |
Insights from Our Sensor Testing:
-
Olympus E-3's Four Thirds sensor is physically much larger, translating directly to better light-gathering ability. This advantage results in superior dynamic range (10.5 stops per DxOMark) and color depth (21.6 bits), enabling richer tonal gradients and more flexibility in post-processing.
-
Despite having twice the megapixels, the Sony HX350’s smaller 1/2.3" sensor faces limitations in noise levels and dynamic range. This smaller sensor also means less light capture per pixel, which impacts image quality particularly in low-light conditions.
Our extensive lab and field tests showed the E-3 delivers cleaner files at high ISOs and smoother tonal transitions, which is crucial for professional applications such as portraits, landscapes, and commercial work.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catch Every Moment or Move at Your Pace?
Feature | Olympus E-3 | Sony HX350 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Phase-Detection (11 points) | Contrast-Detection + Face AF |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | 10 fps |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Selective | Single, Continuous, Selective |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Tracking | No | No |
The Olympus E-3 relies on phase-detection autofocus via 11 AF points and supports continuous AF for up to 5 fps bursts. Its precision AF system, however, lacks face or eye detection by modern standards, typical of DSLRs from its era.
The Sony HX350, despite having a simpler contrast-detection AF, reaches double the burst rate at 10 fps, making it competitive for fast-moving subjects. Moreover, its face-detection AF greatly benefits casual portrait and street photographers by automating focus on faces.
Our field testing highlighted the E-3's robust autofocus accuracy in daylight but slower performance in low light. The HX350 was quick for its class, but less reliable in tracking unpredictable wildlife or sports subjects due to lack of phase AF.
Viewing Experience and Interface: Seeing Is Believing
Feature | Olympus E-3 | Sony HX350 |
---|---|---|
Viewfinder | Optical Pentaprism (100% coverage) | Electronic (202k pixels, 100% coverage) |
Rear Screen | 2.5" Fully Articulated (230k pixels) | 3" Tilting (922k pixels) |
Touchscreen | No | No |
The E-3 offers the tried-and-true advantage of an optical viewfinder with zero lag and 100% frame coverage, critical for professional accuracy. Its articulated screen can flip for high and low angles, adding compositional flexibility.
The HX350’s EVF, while useful for composing in bright conditions, has modest resolution and lag, which can be a detraction for fast-moving subjects. However, its 3-inch high-res LCD is excellent for reviewing images and shooting at unusual angles.
From real-world use, the E-3 is tailored for photographers who prefer traditional optical feedback, while the HX350’s screen and EVF combo appeal to users favoring composition versatility in travel and casual use.
Image Samples Gallery: A Picture Tells a Thousand Words
To illustrate how these cameras perform harmoniously, here are a few samples side-by-side across different genres.
Observations:
-
Portraits: The E-3 delivers creamy bokeh and more natural skin tones, aided by its larger sensor and native lens optics.
-
Landscape: Far-reaching dynamic range and resolution clarity from the E-3 outclass the HX350, especially in bright highlights and shadow details.
-
Wildlife/Telephoto: HX350’s incredible 50x zoom lens captures distant subjects inaccessible to E-3 without additional tele lenses, yet softer image quality at full zoom reflects sensor-size limits.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Shooting in Tough Conditions?
The Olympus E-3 was designed with pros in mind. It features comprehensive weather sealing, making it resistant to dust and moisture - a vital attribute for landscape and wildlife photographers shooting outdoors in variable weather.
In contrast, Sony HX350 lacks environmental sealing, reflecting its consumer-targeted build focused on portability, perfect for travel photographers who prefer compact gear and less rugged environments.
Versatility Across Photography Genres: Which Excels Where?
Below is a genre-specific performance analysis to help pinpoint the right camera for your interests.
-
Portrait Photography: The Olympus E-3’s sensor size supports smoother skin rendering and natural bokeh. No eye-detection AF, but manual focus peppers creative control.
-
Landscape Photography: Olympian superiority with dynamic range and weather sealing for challenging conditions.
-
Wildlife Photography: Sony’s HX350’s zoom wins by enabling 1200mm telephoto range with stable optical IS, albeit at the expense of image quality and autofocus precision at long range.
-
Sports Photography: Neither is tailored for high-speed sports; E-3 has decent 5 fps continuous but lacks tracking, while HX350 bursts faster but with less accuracy.
-
Street Photography: HX350 wins for portability and quiet operation; optical zoom replaces the need for multiple lenses.
-
Macro Photography: HX350’s 1 cm close focus point and stabilized lens support macro shooting, whereas E-3 requires dedicated macro lenses.
-
Night/Astro Photography: The E-3’s sensor offers superior low-light noise control for astrophotography, combined with manual exposure and robust RAW files.
-
Video: Only the Sony HX350 records HD video (1080p) with built-in stabilization, usable for casual recording; Olympus E-3 lacks video capabilities.
-
Travel Photography: HX350’s compact form and versatile zoom make it ideal; E-3 is bulkier but better in tough weather conditions with professional image quality.
-
Professional Work: E-3 supports RAW files for maximal editing and has proven reliability, while HX350 is oriented toward convenience shooters without RAW.
Workflow and Connectivity
Connectivity is basic on both models:
-
Olympus supports USB 2.0 and dual card slots (CF and xD cards) providing professional backup options.
-
Sony allows SD and Memory Stick cards, USB 2.0, and HDMI output for displaying images and videos on compatible displays.
Neither supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, which is expected for their generations.
Battery Life and Storage
-
Olympus E-3: Uses proprietary batteries with unspecified official battery life but known for endurance due to lower LCD resolution and absence of video.
-
Sony HX350: Rated for approximately 300 shots per charge, typical for compact superzoom cameras.
Assessing Value: Which Model Fits Your Vision?
Feature | Olympus E-3 | Sony HX350 |
---|---|---|
Launch Year | 2008 | 2016 |
Launch Price | ~$670 (used market) | ~$300-350 (used market) |
Unique Strength | Professional DSLR features, durability, image quality | Ultra zoom range, video recording, portability |
Primary Weakness | Bulk, outdated AF, no video | Small sensor limitations, no RAW |
Our Practical Recommendation:
-
Choose the Olympus E-3 if you:
- Value optical viewfinder and tactile controls for immersive photography
- Shoot frequently in landscapes, portraits, or low-light scenarios
- Need a rugged, weather-sealed body for outdoor work
- Prefer RAW editing and maximum image quality over compactness
-
Opt for the Sony HX350 if you:
- Desire an all-in-one travel-friendly superzoom with video features
- Enjoy wildlife, street, or casual photography without changing lenses
- Prioritize portability and easy sharing over ultimate image fidelity
- Seek budget-friendly versatility with manual controls
Overall Performance Scores
For a succinct view, here are the aggregated performance rankings based on lab tests and field work.
-
Olympus E-3 leads in image quality, build, and professional applications.
-
Sony HX350 excels in zoom versatility and video.
Final Thoughts: How to Move Forward
Selecting a camera is an intensely personal decision entwined with your creative goals. The Olympus E-3, though older, remains a solid choice for dedicated photographers craving professional handling and image excellence. The Sony HX350’s remarkable zoom and compact design suit those who favor flexibility and convenience over pixel-level perfection.
We recommend that you test these cameras personally if possible - comfort and ease of use are just as vital as specs. Pair the E-3 with some quality Four Thirds lenses to unlock its potential, or explore the HX350’s zoom range for your travel adventures.
Remember, your gear should inspire and empower your creative expression. Whichever you pick, both cameras offer a fascinating window into the evolution of photographic technology and the diverse ways we capture the world.
Happy shooting, and may your images tell your story brilliantly!
For further exploration, consider getting accessories such as protective filters for the Olympus E-3’s lenses, spare batteries for extended shoots, and quality memory cards matching each camera’s specs. Keep an eye on firmware updates and community tips to optimize camera performance.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 652 grams (1.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $670 | - |