Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 and Sony W330, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and W330 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and W330 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was unveiled 22 months prior to the W330 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-3 matches up versus the W330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony W330
E-3 | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus E-3
W330 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony W330
E-3 | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 offers exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Sony W330 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 and Sony W330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-3 compared to the W330.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and W330 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and W330.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W330 will give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W330 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $670 | $170 |