Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
53
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Revealed March 2009
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Launched February 2018
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-30 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-30 matches up versus the ZS200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic ZS200

 E-30 ZS200 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-30

 ZS200 E-30 
LaunchedFebruary 2018March 2009Fresher by 108 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1240k230kClearer display (+1010k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS200

 E-30 ZS200 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 comes with outer dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-30 and the ZS200.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and ZS200 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and ZS200.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-30 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography advice
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
65
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography information
72
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
77
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
delivers RAW files
comes with focus via touch
no moving screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-30
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS200
51
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
low battery (750 per charge)
70
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
includes tracking focus
great battery life (370 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Travel photography camera
49
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery (750 CIPA)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
76
great battery life (370 shots)
has bluetooth
comes with focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Landscape photography camera
52
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
low battery (750 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
69
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
delivers RAW files
great battery life (370 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-30
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS200
18
can't record video
35
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus E-30Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-30 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Otherwise known as - Lumix DC-TZ200
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-03-24 2018-02-13
Body design Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS MOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,240k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dot
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695g (1.53 lbs) 340g (0.75 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 images 370 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $1,299 $800