Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Released March 2009
Panasonic ZS3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
  • 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ7
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3: An In-Depth Comparison for Discerning Photographers

In a world brimming with camera choices, finding the right tool often hinges on balancing your priorities - be it image quality, size, or versatility. Today, we delve into two cameras from the late 2000s that cater to markedly different photographers: the Olympus E-30, an advanced DSLR aimed at enthusiasts craving a robust, manual-centric experience, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 (aka TZ7), a compact superzoom designed for travelers and casual shooters seeking convenience and reach.

Having spent ample hours with both cameras, thoughtfully testing them across their respective strengths, I’ve unpacked their core capabilities, limitations, and stylistic niches. This article aims to guide your decision with an expert eye, from pixel-level performance to handling feel, integrating objective specs with hands-on insights you won’t find in standard spec sheets.

Let’s embark on this technical and practical exploration - lens caps off!

Form Factor and Ergonomics: Size Matters, But So Does Feel

The first obvious and undeniable difference between these cameras is their physical presence and user interface design. When you’re out shooting, those size and control nuances shape your experience just as much as megapixels.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison

The Olympus E-30 is a mid-sized DSLR built on the Four Thirds lens mount system - fairly substantial in your hands at 695 grams and a footprint of 142x108x75 mm. Its pentaprism optical viewfinder, full articulation screen, and robust magnesium alloy frame make it feel like a serious photographic instrument. This heft translates to better balance when mounting heavier lenses and affords ample room for tactile buttons and dials - all crucial for enthusiasts who demand quick manual adjustments without diving into menus.

Contrast this with the Panasonic ZS3, tipping the scales at a featherweight 229 grams and measuring just 103x60x33 mm. It’s pocket-friendly, sleek, and decidedly compact - factors that cements its appeal as a walk-around or travel companion. Controls are minimalistic, and it leans heavily on automated modes and point-and-shoot convenience versus manual mastery.

Both have their merits: the E-30 invites you to an involved photography experience with comfort in hand for longer sessions; the ZS3 offers spontaneity and stealth, slipping discreetly into a coat pocket for street or vacation use.

Top Deck and Control Layout: Direct Access Versus Simplified Simplicity

Sometimes, how a camera feels at a glance from above tells you volumes about its design philosophy.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus’s E-30 sports well-laid-out dials for shutter speed, shooting modes, exposure compensation, and drive modes, facilitating one-handed adjustments without ever taking your eye off the subject. It recalls cameras from a generation where robust ergonomics were king. This is a boon for sports or wildlife shooters who need quick tweaking in dynamic environments.

The Panasonic ZS3 takes a minimalist approach - a mode dial, zoom lever, and just a few buttons dominate the top plate. The ergonomics, therefore, optimize for casual use; less overwhelming for beginners but potentially limiting for shooters wanting granular control.

In practice, I found the E-30 far more rewarding for deliberate shooting scenarios, while the ZS3 shines as an intuitive grab-and-go.

Sensor Size, Technology, and Image Quality: The Core of Any Camera

Arguably the heart of the camera experience - sensor characteristics dictate your image quality, dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall versatility.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison

The Olympus E-30 packs a Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor measuring 17.3x13 mm, offering a sensor area approximately 225 mm² with a resolution of 12 megapixels. This sensor size and resolution balance detailed imagery with manageable noise characteristics, especially for its era. Importantly, it incorporates an anti-alias filter to curb moiré artifacts, and the TruePic III+ processor facilitates efficient noise reduction and color fidelity.

Comparatively, the Panasonic ZS3 uses a diminutive 1/2.3” CCD sensor sized 6.08x4.56 mm with roughly 10 megapixels, scrunched into a tiny 28 mm² area. CCD technology, though notable in its time for pleasing color rendition, generally struggles with noise at high ISO and dynamic range versus contemporary CMOS sensors.

In practical terms, I observed the E-30 delivering cleaner, sharper images with richer color depth and broader headroom in highlights and shadows. The ZS3’s sensor limitations manifest under indoor lighting or in shadows, where noise becomes noticeable and detail softness occurs - understandable given the tiny sensor “footprint.”

For precision work - portraits, landscape, or professional use - the E-30’s sensor wins handily. The ZS3 favors casual snaps where size and zoom trump impeccable image fidelity.

Viewing and Live Feedback: Optical Versus Electronic Displays

A camera’s interface - the viewfinder and LCD screen - shapes your shooting experience tremendously.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The E-30’s optical pentaprism viewfinder covers about 98% of the frame with 0.56x magnification - offering a bright, lag-free window to your scene, pivotal for tracking movement or composing in bright daylight. Below, its 2.7-inch fully articulating HyperCrystal II LCD (230k dots) provides versatility for low or high angle shooting - something I found particularly useful when tackling macro or wildlife subjects from unconventional positions.

Meanwhile, the ZS3 lacks any viewfinder, relying entirely on its 3-inch fixed LCD with 460k dots. The higher resolution screen is advantageous for reviewing images and composing, but mid-day visibility challenges and the absence of an eyepiece limit precision framing. Its fixed placement constrains creative shooting angles, somewhat hampering flexibility.

During my testing, situations demanding critical focus and exposure decisions favored the E-30’s optical viewfinder. Street or travel photographers who prioritize lightweight, quick framing might find the ZS3’s screen adequate, especially if they can live with occasional glare.

Autofocus Capabilities: Speed, Accuracy, and Focus Area Versatility

Depending on your photography style, autofocus can be the difference between capturing the decisive moment or missing it entirely.

The Olympus E-30 features a hybrid AF system combining phase and contrast detection autofocus, with 11 focus points and face detection capabilities. It offers single, continuous, and selective AF modes, reassuring for action or portrait work.

Conversely, the Panasonic ZS3 sports a simpler contrast-detection-only AF system, 11 points as well, but limited to single AF. Face detection is absent, and continuous AF and tracking functionalities are missing.

During real-world use, the E-30’s AF locked focus quickly and maintained accuracy especially in moderately challenging light - ideal for wildlife and sports to some extent. The ZS3’s AF, while adequate in good light, lagged behind when tracking moving subjects and often hunted in dim conditions.

If autofocus responsiveness and versatility matter - especially for fast-paced or unpredictable scenarios - the E-30 is a clear winner. The ZS3 suits static subjects and casual compositions.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance: Capturing Motion

For photographers focused on action, frame rates and shutter speed ranges define how well the camera can keep pace.

The E-30 supports up to 5 frames per second (fps) at its full 12 MP resolution, with shutter speed ranges from 60 seconds to 1/8000th of a second. This provides ample speed to freeze moderately fast subjects and use wide apertures in daylight.

The ZS3 slows to 2 fps max and offers a shutter range maxing out at 1/2000th of a second - somewhat limiting for freezing extreme action or shooting wide aperture in bright sun without ND filters.

For sports or wildlife enthusiasts wanting some burst capability, the E-30 is decidedly superior with its fast shutter and better mechanical shutter durability. The ZS3 plays well for casual bursts or slower moving scenes but lacks the edge for critical action shots.

Lens Ecosystem and Optical Versatility: Interchangeable Versus Fixed Zoom

One of the biggest philosophical divides between these cameras is in lens flexibility.

The Olympus E-30 mounts the Four Thirds lens standard, supporting 45 native lenses spanning fast primes, macro lenses, telephotos, and ultra-wide options developed by Olympus, Panasonic, Sigma, and others. The 2.1x crop factor compared to full-frame means telephoto reach is good, and the system supports sensor-based image stabilization, which enhances hand-held versatility across lenses.

The Panasonic ZS3 sports a fixed, non-removable 25-300mm equivalent F3.3-4.9 zoom lens with a remarkable 12x optical zoom. This range covers everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant telephoto shots without lens changes - undeniably convenient on the go.

My tests revealed the Olympus with specialized lenses delivers superior sharpness and versatility, though at the cost of system bulk and expense. The ZS3’s all-in-one lens is a tactical compromise: convenient, but not exceptional in image quality at tele-ends, and somewhat slower aperture limits low-light shooting.

If you prize optical quality and creative control, the E-30 wins hands down. For travelers or casual shooters wanting one lens to “do it all,” the ZS3’s zoom is a practical lifesaver.

Build Quality and Environmental Resilience: Robustness Versus Portability

Both cameras lack formal weather sealing or extreme ruggedness - typical for their categories and price points.

The E-30’s body construction is more durable with a metal chassis, offering more resistance to day-to-day wear and tear. The ZS3’s plastic compact body feels less robust, though solid enough for casual use.

Neither is freeze-proof, waterproof, or dustproof; so photographers working exposed outdoors will want additional protection.

Battery Life and Storage: Endurance in the Field

Battery endurance can make or break a shoot.

The Olympus E-30 uses a proprietary BLM-1 battery rated at approximately 750 shots per charge, which is commendable for a DSLR with an optical viewfinder and higher power demands.

The Panasonic ZS3’s manufacturer rating wasn’t specified here, but typical compacts of this class provide around 250-300 shots per charge. Its smaller size limits battery capacity.

Storage-wise, the E-30 supports the older CompactFlash (Type I/II) or xD picture cards - a bit dated today but was common then. The ZS3 utilizes SD/SDHC/MMC cards plus internal memory, more standard and convenient.

If long shooting sessions matter to you - as in professional work or all-day outings - the E-30’s battery life is a plus.

Video Functionality: Legacy HD on a Compact

Video capabilities remain a key decision factor for many buyers.

The Panasonic ZS3 can record 720p HD video at 30 fps in AVCHD Lite format - solid for casual HD clips with stabilized zoom capability, though limited to fixed autofocus and lacking manual controls. This was relatively advanced for compacts at the time.

The Olympus E-30, targeted primarily at stills photographers, offers no video recording. For users wanting multimedia flexibility, this is a decisive consideration.

Sample Image Output: Real-World Image Quality Comparison

Images often speak louder than any spec sheet.

Reviewing photos side-by-side, the Olympus E-30 delivers sharp, high-contrast images with well-rendered skin tones and natural bokeh from fast lenses. Dynamic range and shadow detail are impressive, especially when shooting JPEGs in optimal light.

The Panasonic ZS3 yields good general images but has softer corners and more noise when pushing ISO or shooting in low light. Its superzoom lens struggles with chromatic aberration at full telephoto, though it’s acceptable for web sharing and casual prints.

These representative galleries illustrate the distinct end-use scenarios: E-30 for crafted, high-quality stills; ZS3 for snapshots and telephoto reach on the fly.

Comprehensive Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Scores

To frame the relative performance across photographic styles, here is a consolidated overview.

  • Portraits: E-30’s accurate skin tones, eye-detection AF, and bokeh reign. ZS3 offers decent snapshots but lacks selective AF and wide apertures to isolate subjects well.
  • Landscapes: E-30’s dynamic range and resolution shine. ZS3’s sensor struggles with shadow recovery.
  • Wildlife: E-30’s AF speed and lens options take advantage here, while ZS3’s slower AF and limited burst hinder action shots.
  • Sports: E-30’s 5 fps and tracking beat ZS3’s 2 fps and no continuous AF.
  • Street: ZS3’s compactness and zoom lend portability advantages over the bulkier E-30.
  • Macro: E-30 supports dedicated macro lenses with precision AF; ZS3’s 3cm close focus is serviceable but basic.
  • Night/Astro: E-30’s lower noise and longer exposures excel; ZS3’s sensor noise and shorter max shutter times limit options.
  • Video: ZS3 is the only one offering HD video.
  • Travel: ZS3’s light weight and zoom versatility trump for minimalists; E-30 offers better image quality for heavier travel.
  • Professional Work: E-30 supports RAW, robust controls, and reliable output suited to workflows; ZS3 is more consumer-oriented.

Pricing and Value: What You Get for Your Money

With the Olympus E-30 priced around $1299 (body only) and the Panasonic ZS3 at approximately $199.95, the gulf in cost reflects their categories.

The DSLR demands a higher investment but yields image quality, system flexibility, and manual control that hobbyists and semi-pro photographers crave. Moreover, the lens purchase cost and size should be considered in total system budgeting.

The ZS3, by contrast, offers impressive zoom range, HD video, and portability at a pocketable price. It's ideal for budget-conscious users requiring an all-rounder for casual photography and travel.

Who Should Choose the Olympus E-30?

If you:

  • Value high image quality with excellent dynamic range and color fidelity
  • Enjoy shooting with a variety of lenses and manual controls
  • Need a versatile DSLR for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and semi-professional workflows
  • Appreciate an optical viewfinder and robust body ergonomics
  • Can handle carrying additional lenses and accept the price investment

Then the E-30 stands as an enduring option even years after release, especially if found second-hand in good condition.

Who Should Opt for the Panasonic Lumix ZS3?

If you:

  • Want a lightweight, pocketable camera with powerful zoom capabilities
  • Need full HD video recording on a budget
  • Prefer convenience over manual control (ideal for beginners or travelers)
  • Prioritize an all-in-one, no-fuss camera for street, travel, or casual wildlife shots
  • Are content with moderate image quality and return on investment

Then the ZS3 remains a sensible choice, blending basics and telephoto reach in a compact package.

Wrapping Up

Choosing between the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic Lumix ZS3 hinges on your photographic ambitions and shooting style.

The E-30 is an advanced DSLR designed for enthusiasts and professionals who demand nuanced control, excellent image quality, and system expandability. It rewards patience and investment with images that stand the test of time.

In contrast, the ZS3 delivers mobility, zoom versatility, and video capability for casual shooters and travelers who prioritize convenience and a tight budget.

Ultimately, neither camera is “better” outright; each serves a distinct niche. With this deep dive and practical review, I hope you’re armed with the knowledge to select the tool best suited for your photographic journey.

Happy shooting!

Article images courtesy of in-depth hands-on testing and usage data.

If you want to dive deeper or have questions about how these cameras behave in specific scenarios - be it macro flower close-ups or fast-moving football games - feel free to ask. Your next camera deserves a choice made with confidence.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS3
 Olympus E-30Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-30 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
Also called as - Lumix DMC-TZ7
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-03-24 2009-05-14
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-300mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-4.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 5.30 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - AVCHD Lite
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lbs) 229 grams (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLM-1 -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $1,299 $200