Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5R front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
76
Overall
64

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Launched March 2009
Sony NEX-5R
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Previous Model is Sony NEX-5N
  • Updated by Sony NEX-5T
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R: A Deep Dive Into Two Distinct Eras of Imaging

As someone who has tested well over a thousand cameras - from the dawn of DSLRs to today’s mirrorless marvels - I’m always curious how older technology stacks up against newer innovations in real-world use. The Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-5R are intriguing subjects for comparison because they represent different design philosophies and technological epochs.

The Olympus E-30 is a 2009 advanced DSLR with a Four Thirds sensor, celebrated for its robust build and traditional handling, while the Sony NEX-5R, from 2012, is an entry-level mirrorless shooter sporting an APS-C sensor focused on compactness and modern connectivity. Let's unpack their features, performance, and suitability for various photographic needs.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Design Philosophy

When you pick up the E-30, its solid mid-size DSLR body feels reassuring in hand, built like a tank for a camera of its time. Contrast this with the NEX-5R’s compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless design that feels lightweight and nimble.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R size comparison

Looking closely at dimensions and weight - Olympus at ~695g vs Sony at ~276g - the size difference is significant. The E-30’s heft brings stability, especially when paired with longer lenses, while the NEX-5R’s featherweight stature wins points on travel portability and street shooting discretion.

The E-30 features a fully articulated 2.7" HyperCrystal II LCD (230k pixels), ideal for creative angles and video framing. The NEX-5R counters with a more modest but sharper 3.0” tilting TFT LCD (920k pixels) that tilts up 180° for selfies and tumbling angles, plus touch capability enhancing live view focusing speed.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R top view buttons comparison

Controls reflect their eras. The Olympus sports a traditional DSLR layout with dedicated dials and buttons for quick exposure adjustments. The Sony offers fewer physical buttons, relying more on menu navigation and touchscreen interface. I find the Olympus approach better for fast-paced shooting, while the Sony’s compact body demands more menu dives, which may frustrate seasoned shooters.

Sensor & Image Quality: Size Matters - But So Does Processing

The heart of any camera is its sensor. Here we see a fundamental difference:

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R sensor size comparison

  • Olympus E-30: Four Thirds CMOS, 12MP, sensor size 17.3 x 13 mm, 2.1x crop factor.
  • Sony NEX-5R: APS-C CMOS, 16MP, sensor size 23.4 x 15.6 mm, 1.5x crop factor.

The Sony’s APS-C sensor is roughly 60% larger in surface area, which translates into better raw data capture potential and an edge in low-light performance. In fact, DxO’s scores back this up, with the NEX-5R holding a significant lead in overall image quality (78 vs 55), color depth, dynamic range, and low-light ISO performance.

In my tests shooting identical scenes under mixed lighting, the NEX-5R produces files with cleaner shadows and more vibrant colors. The E-30’s photos exhibit a bit more noise at higher ISOs (above 800) and slightly reduced dynamic range, a common limitation with its older CMOS and smaller sensor.

However, Olympus counters with in-body sensor-shift stabilization - a massive advantage when shooting handheld in low light or with legacy lenses. The NEX-5R lacks sensor stabilization, relying on optically stabilized lenses (which are less common in the Sony E mount).

Autofocus Systems: Speed vs Precision in Different Scenarios

Both cameras utilize hybrid autofocus systems combining phase detection and contrast detection, but the execution differs:

  • Olympus E-30 offers 11 AF points with face detection and contrast-based live view AF.
  • Sony NEX-5R boasts an impressive 99 AF points with phase detection, touch-to-focus, and continuous tracking for moving subjects.

This difference plays out clearly in high-action scenarios. The NEX-5R’s advanced AF system locks on faster and maintains focus on moving targets better, making it a more capable tool for sports and wildlife shooters who need quick tracking.

In contrast, the E-30’s autofocus works well for studio or portraiture where precision is paramount, but tracking fast subjects is a challenge. For portraits, its face detection helps nail camera focus on eyes for sharp skin tones and detailed expressions.

Shooting Styles Explored: From Portraits to Nightscapes

Portrait Photography

For portraits, the E-30’s 12MP sensor may sound low by modern standards, but its color rendering, combined with Olympus’ in-body stabilization, yields smooth, flattering skin tones and beautiful background separation when paired with a fast lens. The articulated screen aids creative composition for off-angle portraits.

The NEX-5R, with its larger sensor and better low-light ISO handling, allows more flexibility in natural light and produces images with more detail and punch. However, the Sony’s smaller body and less tactile controls might hinder quick adjustments during dynamic portrait sessions.

Landscape Photography

Landscape photographers value resolution and dynamic range. The NEX-5R’s 16MP APS-C sensor with superior dynamic range provides richer shadow and highlight details, crucial for scenic shots with broad tonal variation.

Neither camera offers weather sealing or freeze-proofing, limiting their use in extreme outdoor conditions, but the Olympus’ robust build gives some peace of mind in damp conditions. The E-30’s articulating screen assists when composing tricky shots on uneven terrain.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Here the NEX-5R shines with its burst shooting speed of 10 fps and excellent continuous autofocus tracking compared to the E-30’s 5 fps and limited AF tracking. Coupled with the wider Sony E lens selection, especially telephotos, it’s a preferable system for capturing rapid wildlife activity or fast-moving sports.

The E-30’s 2.1x crop factor further extends reach when pairing with telephoto lenses - a useful trick for distant subjects, but the slower fps and AF somewhat blunt this advantage.

Street Photography

Street shooters often prize compactness and discretion, making the NEX-5R’s lightweight body and quiet operation attractive. Its tilting, high-res LCD makes framing and reviewing shots easier on the fly.

The E-30, being bulkier and louder due to the mirror mechanism, is less ideal for candid, stealthy shooting. But its optical viewfinder provides clear, lag-free framing, preferred by traditionalists.

Macro and Close-Up Shots

Although neither camera emphasizes macro capabilities, Olympus’ sensor stabilization can help handheld macro shots by reducing shake, allowing sharper details in close focus. The NEX-5R’s superior resolution counters this with finer detail capture but lacks built-in stabilization.

Proper macro lenses are essential; the Sony E mount has a few quality options to consider, but the Olympus Four Thirds system’s smaller sensor encourages genuinely close focusing lenses.

Night and Astro Photography

Astrophotographers appreciate a sensor’s ability to handle high ISO and long exposures.

The NEX-5R supports ISO sensitivity up to 25600, offering usable high ISO results for star fields with lower noise levels. The E-30 maxes out at ISO 3200, limiting astro potential.

Neither camera features built-in long exposure noise reduction modes or astro-specific features, but both allow manual control over exposure length. The NEX-5R’s superior dynamic range and noise handling give it the edge for nightscapes and star photography.

Video Capabilities: A Different League

The Olympus E-30, despite being an advanced DSLR for its time, lacks any video recording functions. This omission is a major limitation for anyone interested in multimedia or hybrid photography-video workflows.

In contrast, the NEX-5R shoots Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps in AVCHD format with clean HDMI output. Its tilting touchscreen assists video autofocus, although there is no dedicated mic or headphone port, which constrains audio control for serious video creators.

Hence, for video enthusiasts prioritizing hybrid use, the Sony is clearly the better choice.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

Olympus provides outstanding battery longevity - about 750 shots per charge with the BLM-1 battery pack - perfect for extended outings without frequent recharging. The E-30 also supports CompactFlash and xD cards, though these media are increasingly rare and expensive.

The Sony NEX-5R is rated for around 330 shots per battery cycle, notably shorter due to its power-hungry touchscreen and Wi-Fi module. Storage uses more modern and affordable SD/SDHC/SDXC cards plus Memory Stick formats.

Connectivity-wise, the NEX-5R is ahead with built-in wireless transfer for instant sharing - no such functionality exists on the older E-30, which only offers USB 2.0 for tethered connections. HDMI on the Sony supports external video monitoring.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

While both cameras lack official weather sealing, the E-30’s body is sturdier, exhibiting better resistance to dust and minor impacts with its robust chassis. Sony’s NEX-5R, designed for portability, sacrifices much in durability.

This higher reliability factor with Olympus may sway pro users or those shooting in rough conditions despite the other technical shortcomings.

Lens Ecosystem: Depth vs Breadth

The Olympus utilizes the Four Thirds mount, with roughly 45 lenses available at release time, including many high-quality optics optimized for the sensor size.

Sony’s E mount lens count is substantially higher (121 lenses available) and growing fast due to Sony’s mirrorless market push. From primes to zooms, the E mount offers a versatile selection rivaling larger APS-C and even full-frame systems.

This lens availability difference is crucial - while quality lenses matter most, variety and innovation give the Sony system a significant advantage in adaptability.

User Interface and Experience

The Olympus’ physical dials and straightforward button layout lend themselves to quicker learning and faster in-action adjustments. The articulated screen is handy but lower res and lacks touch.

The NEX-5R's touch interface speeds up live view autofocus and menu navigation but lacks the tactile controls many photographers rely on for muscle memory during shoots.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and Viewfinder comparison

In my experience, the Olympus suits photographers who prioritize tactile control and traditional ergonomics; the Sony better serves users comfortable with digital menus and touchscreens, especially in casual or travel contexts.

Real-World Image Gallery: See the Results

I include a comparative gallery of handheld shots across genres - portraits capturing skin tone fidelity, landscapes showing dynamic range, and fast-moving subjects highlighting autofocus speed.

The differences illustrate the Sony’s edge in detail and exposure latitude, while the Olympus occasionally impresses with colors and stabilization-based sharpness in tricky light.

Performance Scores Snapshot

For those who appreciate numeric evaluation alongside qualitative experience, here is an overview based on DxOMark and my metric analyses:

The Sony NEX-5R ranks higher across imaging parameters, speed, and features, while the Olympus E-30 holds its ground in build and ergonomics.

Matchmaking for Photography Genres

How do these cameras stack up per genre?

Photography Type Olympus E-30 Sony NEX-5R
Portrait Very good skin tone, nice ibis bokeh, slower AF Excellent detail, fast AF, better low light
Landscape Good color, stable build Higher resolution, wider flexibility
Wildlife Limited AF speed, slower burst Great AF tracking, faster burst
Sports Not ideal - slow buffer and AF Better suited, faster frame rate
Street Bulky and louder Compact, quiet, discreet
Macro In-body IS aids sharpness Finer detail, no IBIS
Night/Astro Limited ISO, some noise Superior noise control, higher ISO
Video None Full HD video, decent codecs
Travel Durable, heavier Lightweight, wireless transfer
Professional Work Sturdy, reliable Flexible, fast workflow

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Who Should Choose the Olympus E-30?

  • Experienced DSLR users who favor a traditional shooting experience and want solid build quality.
  • Photographers prioritizing in-body stabilization, especially with legacy Four Thirds lenses.
  • Users with a focus on still photography, particularly portraits and landscapes where camera sturdiness matters.
  • Those who value long battery life and comfortable ergonomics more than the latest tech bells and whistles.
  • Buyers dealing on a budget and willing to hunt for used gear, understanding its age and limitations.

Who Gains Most from the Sony NEX-5R?

  • Enthusiasts and entry-level pros seeking modern features in a compact package.
  • Photographers valuing superior image quality, better low-light performance, and faster autofocus systems.
  • Hybrid shooters who require HD video capabilities and wireless connectivity.
  • Travelers and street photographers who demand portability and discretion.
  • Users with an eye on future expandability via the large, evolving lens ecosystem.

Closing Remarks: Bridging Generations of Photography

The Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-5R paint a vivid narrative of technological progress and evolving photographic practices. The E-30 is a testament to the durability and tactile pleasure of DSLRs, while the NEX-5R reflects the mirrorless revolution with its focus on compactness, speed, and connectivity.

My advice: consider how you work, your genre priorities, and lifestyle when choosing between them. The Olympus embraces the classic DSLR philosophy with its strengths and quirks. The Sony paves the way towards mobile, versatile, and multimedia-capable photography.

Photography is a personal journey. Both cameras can be excellent companions - but which one suits your story best?

I hope this deep dive helps you make a fully informed choice. Feel free to reach out if you want to discuss specific shooting styles or accessory options - I’m always eager to share insights from my years behind the lens.

Happy shooting!

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-5R
 Olympus E-30Sony Alpha NEX-5R
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-30 Sony Alpha NEX-5R
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-03-24 2012-08-29
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 11 99
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695g (1.53 pounds) 276g (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 78
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 13.1
DXO Low light score 530 910
Other
Battery life 750 photographs 330 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $1,299 $750