Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-30 and Sony H55, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the H55 (14MP) is very well matched but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-30 was introduced 14 months earlier than the H55 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-30 grades vs the H55 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony H55
E-30 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-30
H55 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | March 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony H55
E-30 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 provides outer dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Sony H55 has dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 and Sony H55 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-30 and the H55.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and H55 is 60 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and H55.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony H55 will give greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-30 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,299 | $235 |