Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the E-420 (10MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was unveiled 4 years prior to the E-420 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-300 matches up vs the E-420 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-420. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus E-420 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-420
E-300 | E-420 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus E-300
E-420 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2008 | January 2005 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-420
E-300 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-420 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 vs the E-420.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-420 is 67 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The visual here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and E-420.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus E-420 to give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-420 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-420 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2008-06-23 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 527 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $999 |