Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-PM2, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was introduced 9 years earlier than the E-PM2 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades against the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-PM2

 E-300 E-PM2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-300

 E-PM2 E-300 
RevealedMay 2013January 2005Newer by 101 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kSharper screen (+326k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PM2

 E-300 E-PM2 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 offers external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 and the E-PM2.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E-PM2 is 67 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-PM2.

Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-PM2 to result in greater detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Portrait photography camera
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
71
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Olympus E-PM2 Street photography features
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
includes touch to focus
good ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography highlights
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
includes touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse function
74
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
36
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PM2
 Olympus E-300Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2005-01-10 2013-05-21
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 269g (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 72
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.2
DXO Low light score not tested 932
Other
Battery life - 360 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $800 $448