Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ100
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37


67 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ200

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiast Photographers
Choosing your next camera is a pivotal step in your creative journey. With decades of hands-on camera testing behind us, we’ll guide you through a detailed, experience-driven comparison between two interesting models: the Olympus E-300, a pioneering mid-2000s DSLR aimed at serious amateurs, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100, a versatile superzoom bridge camera popular among enthusiasts seeking all-in-one convenience. Despite their different categories and release years, both cameras target photographers eager to expand their skills without immediately diving into professional-level gear.
Dive in with us as we explore their design, imaging capabilities, performance across photography genres, and value for money - that way, you can confidently choose which aligns best with your artistic goals.
Physical Design and Handling: Ergonomics Meet Portability
The feel of a camera in your hands shapes your photographic experience just as much as specs on paper. The Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ100 adopt quite different body philosophies, suited to alternative styles of shooting.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Mid-size DSLR | SLR-like Bridge (Superzoom) |
Dimensions (mm) | 147 x 85 x 64 | 124 x 82 x 92 |
Weight (g) | 624 | 540 |
Grip and Controls | Classic DSLR, deeper grip, dedicated buttons | Compact grip, simpler control layout |
Viewfinder | Optical pentamirror | Electronic |
Screen | Fixed 1.8" LCD, 134k pixels | Fully articulating 3" LCD, 460k pixels |
Weather sealing | None | None |
Olympus E-300: The conventional DSLR shape offers a confident handhold and reasonably spaced controls for its time. However, at 624g and a boxier build, it may feel bulky after long shooting sessions. The fixed small-screen and optical pentamirror viewfinder provide a straightforward framing experience but lack modern conveniences like live view or touch interaction.
Panasonic FZ100: This bridge camera’s compact size and lighter weight make it more travel-friendly and discreet for casual shooting or street photography. The fully articulating LCD opens up flexible composition angles and selfies, ideal for vloggers or macro enthusiasts. The electronic viewfinder, while lower resolution, allows previewing exposure and settings in bright conditions. The smaller grip and simplified buttons cater to casual users who want quick access rather than deep customization.
Sensor and Image Quality: Evaluating the Core Performance
Image quality is often the decisive factor, hinging mainly on sensor type, size, and resolution. Let’s unpack how these two differ technically and what that means in real-world shooting.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 224.9 | 27.72 |
Effective Resolution | 8 MP (3264 x 2448) | 14 MP (4320 x 3240) |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Native ISO Range | 100-400 | 100-6400 |
Max Boosted ISO | 1600 | N/A |
RAW Support | Yes | Yes |
Aspect Ratios | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 |
Sensor Technology & Size: The E-300 uses a Four Thirds CCD sensor - large by bridge camera standards - promising better light gathering and signal-to-noise ratio. In contrast, the FZ100’s tiny 1/2.3" CMOS sensor compromises on noise control and dynamic range, especially in low-light. However, Panasonic’s newer Venus Engine processor partly compensates with noise reduction and exposure optimization.
Resolution: While the FZ100 boasts 14 megapixels over the E-300’s 8MP, more pixels on a small sensor can mean increased noise and less light per pixel, impacting clarity at higher ISOs. The lower pixel count on the Four Thirds sensor tends to yield cleaner images, especially at ISO 200-400, making the E-300 preferable for image quality purists.
ISO and Low-Light: The E-300 caps native ISO at 400, and gain-boosted up to 1600, but noise becomes significant. The FZ100 extends ISO easily to 6400, enabling handheld shots in darker scenes - though expect visible grain from small sensor limitations.
In essence, the E-300’s larger sensor enhances image quality, tone gradation, and color fidelity, whereas the FZ100 prioritizes zoom versatility and sensitivity at the cost of high-ISO noise.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Moment
Autofocus systems strongly influence success in dynamic scenarios such as wildlife or sports photography.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic FZ100 |
---|---|---|
AF System Type | Phase Detection, 3 points | Contrast Detection with Face Detection |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Selective | Single, Continuous, Tracking, Face AF |
Burst Rate (fps) | 3 fps | 11 fps |
AF Live View | No | Yes |
AF Accuracy in Low Light | Limited | Better performance with contrast AF |
The E-300’s phase-detection autofocus delivers reliable speed and accuracy in good light, with three focus points enabling some compositional control. However, it lacks eye or face detection - a challenge for portrait photographers seeking sharp eyes.
The FZ100’s contrast-detection system, enhanced with face detection, offers impressive tracking, especially in continuous mode. Its burst shooting at 11 fps outpaces the E-300’s 3 fps significantly - a boon for sports or wildlife scenarios where timing is crucial. Live view AF adds convenience during telephoto or macro shooting.
Build Quality and Weather Resilience
Neither camera features environmental sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance - typical for their classes and eras.
-
Olympus E-300: Solid mid-size DSLR chassis with metal and quality plastics but no weather sealing. Suitable for casual outdoor shooting but avoid wet or dusty conditions.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Molded plastic body designed for easy carry and grip rather than ruggedness. Waterproofing is absent, and durability is average for a bridge camera.
Both will require care in challenging environments, so if your shooting often involves rain, dust, or extreme weather, consider protective gear.
User Interface and Controls: Handling Efficiency
Controls shape your creative workflow. How quickly and intuitively you adjust settings can make or break critical moments.
-
Olympus E-300: Offers traditional DSLR buttons for mode selection (shutter/aperture priority, manual), exposure compensation, and drive modes. The small rear LCD limits immediate visual feedback, necessitating frequent viewfinder use.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Features fully articulated 3-inch LCD for live view and menu navigation. Though it lacks touchscreen, menu systems are logical and straightforward. FZ100 includes familiar PASM modes, and full manual controls can be accessed quickly.
Olympus appeals more to traditionalists who prefer tactile DSLR controls. Panasonic leans towards convenience and versatility with its articulated screen, favorable for video or tricky shooting angles.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
Lens compatibility greatly influences the creative potential and future-proofing of your system.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fixed lens (Non-interchangeable) |
Native Lens Options | 45 lenses (wide to tele) | Integrated 25-600mm zoom (24x) |
Focal Length Multiplier | 2.1x effective multiplier | 5.9x conversion factor (digital zoom) |
Olympus E-300: As a DSLR with a Micro Four Thirds mount, you have access to a broad range of 45 native lenses from Olympus and third-party manufacturers. This unlocks optical quality and creative control unmatched by fixed-lens cameras. Need a fast prime for portraits? A macro lens? A fast telephoto for wildlife? The E-300 has options (though note this original E-300’s mount is Four Thirds; true Micro Four Thirds was introduced later with Olympus E-P1). The 2.1x crop factor affects effective focal lengths, important for framing.
Panasonic FZ100: The fixed lens spans 25-600mm equivalent, emulating telephoto reach in one package - a winning combination for travel and wildlife amateurs who value convenience. The impressive 24x zoom captures distant subjects without lens changes, albeit at variable aperture f/2.8-5.2. However, optical quality generally cannot compete with prime optics or dedicated telephotos.
In short, the E-300 suits photographers who want system expandability, while the FZ100 is a capable all-in-one solution.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | Proprietary Li-ion (details unspecified) | Proprietary Li-ion (details unspecified) |
Storage Media | CompactFlash (Type I/II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC cards |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Both cameras depend on proprietary rechargeable batteries, so carrying spares is advisable for extended shoots. The FZ100’s use of SD cards offers more universal compatibility and affordable capacity, whereas the CF cards used by the E-300 may be costlier and less available today.
Connectivity and Expandability
-
Olympus E-300: Basic USB 1.0 port for tethered shooting or file transfer - slow by modern standards. No wireless features or HDMI output.
-
Panasonic FZ100: USB 2.0 for faster transfers, plus HDMI output to connect external monitors or displays, ideal for reviewing shots or video playback. No wireless connectivity like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
The FZ100’s HDMI port is a plus for multimedia use, whereas the E-300 feels dated in connectivity.
Special Features and Video Capabilities
Video is increasingly vital for content creators.
-
Olympus E-300: No video recording capability.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Capable of Full HD (1920x1080) recording at 60 fps, supporting AVCHD format. It includes microphone input - a key feature for capturing high-quality audio. Optical stabilization aids smooth footage.
For photographers interested in hybrid photo-video work, the FZ100 is clearly superior.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these cameras stack up across diverse photographic disciplines:
Genre | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Larger sensor with natural skin tones but limited focus points and no eye detection. Excellent lens choices help with background separation and bokeh using fast primes. | Face detection autofocus, versatile zoom lens for framing. Smaller sensor produces softer bokeh and less exquisite skin tone rendering. |
Landscape | Better dynamic range and resolution for print-worthy images. Weather sealing absent; tripod use recommended. | Smaller sensor limits dynamic range. Good zoom flexibility for distant scenes. Articulated screen useful for creativity. |
Wildlife | Limited continuous AF and 3 fps frame rate restrict fast action capture but better image quality. Requires telephoto lenses. | Strong AF tracking, 11 fps burst, superb built-in 24x zoom for distant subjects - even in video. Ideal for casual wildlife photography. |
Sports | Modest frame rate and AF system limit in fast-paced scenarios. | Faster burst and tracking AF improve success rate for sports, but small sensor limits low-light performance. |
Street | Bulky size and non-articulating LCD reduce discretion and flexibility. Optical viewfinder beneficial in bright light. | Compact size, articulated screen, and discrete operation better suited to candid street shots. Electronic viewfinder convenient when light is harsh. |
Macro | Good potential with compatible macro lenses, but no built-in stabilization. | Macro focus down to 1cm with optical stabilization; easy to shoot handheld detailed close-ups. |
Night/Astro | Larger sensor better in low light but max native ISO 400 restricts flexibility; no live view or long exposure modes. | Higher ISO range and image stabilization aid slow shutter shooting, but noise increases severely. Live view helps compose astrophotography frames. |
Video | No video recording. | Full HD 60p video with microphone input and stabilization. Great for multimedia creators. |
Travel | Heavier and bulkier, but interchangeable lenses provide flexibility. | Lightweight, all-in-one zoom lens and articulating screen - ideal for travel photography and video. |
Professional Work | Supports RAW, robust image quality, but lacks modern connectivity and rapid AF needed in pro workflows. | RAW support and video capability useful, but fixed lens and sensor limits prosumer use. |
This gallery showcases the nuanced difference in color rendition, sharpness, and noise performance between the two, with the Olympus typically delivering crisper edges and natural tones, while the Panasonic impresses with zoom reach and vibrant output.
Scores and Overall Assessment
Based on combined factors like image quality, autofocus, handling, and features, the Olympus E-300 scores high on core image quality; the Panasonic FZ100 shines for versatility and speed.
The Olympus excels in landscape and portrait photography, whereas the Panasonic leads for wildlife, video, and travel genres.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Choosing between these two cameras ultimately comes down to your priorities, shooting style, and budget:
Why choose the Olympus E-300?
- You prioritize classic DSLR handling and optical viewfinder experience.
- Your focus is on image quality and offline processing, especially for portraits and landscapes.
- You want access to a growing lens system, enabling creative growth.
- You prefer the ability to use RAW files for professional-level editing.
- You shoot mostly in good lighting and don’t need video.
Why pick the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100?
- You want a superzoom all-in-one camera for travel and wildlife without lens changes.
- You seek fast continuous shooting and reliable autofocus tracking for action scenes.
- Video capability with Full HD 60 fps and microphone input is important.
- You value a light, compact package with an articulating screen for flexible shooting angles.
- You prefer face detection autofocus to speed up casual portraits.
Getting Started and Accessories
With either camera, we recommend:
-
Olympus E-300: Invest in at least one fast prime lens for portraits and a versatile zoom lens for day-to-day shooting. A sturdy tripod improves landscape sharpness, and consider a good CF card for ample storage and speed.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Acquire a spare battery and a high-capacity SD card, especially for video captures. A good tripod or monopod pairs well for wildlife or macro work. Consider external microphones for enhanced audio quality.
Embark on your photographic adventure equipped with knowledge tailored to your creative goals. Whether you settle on the Olympus E-300 for classic DSLR craftsmanship or the Panasonic Lumix FZ100 for zooming flexibility and video prowess, both cameras offer unique gateways to the art of photography.
Explore hands-on where possible - visit camera stores or rentals - and see how each feels to you. Gear is an extension of your vision; the right tool will feel like an enabling partner.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ100 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 540 grams (1.19 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $800 | $500 |