Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Released June 2014
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-300 was revealed 10 years earlier than the FZ1000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-300 scores against the FZ1000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-300 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-300
FZ1000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2014 | January 2005 | Newer by 114 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 134k | Sharper screen (+787k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000
E-300 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the FZ1000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FZ1000 is 67 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FZ1000.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide more detail because of its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 831 grams (1.83 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $800 | $800 |