Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front
Portability
55
Imaging
51
Features
80
Overall
62

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
  • 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
  • Released June 2014
  • Newer Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview

The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") use totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was revealed 10 years earlier than the FZ1000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-300 scores against the FZ1000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ1000

 E-300 FZ1000 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-300

 FZ1000 E-300 
ReleasedJune 2014January 2005Newer by 114 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution921k134kSharper screen (+787k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000

 E-300 FZ1000 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the FZ1000.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FZ1000 is 67 and 55 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FZ1000.

As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide more detail because of its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ1000 Portrait photography information
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
70
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ1000 Street photography factors
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
70
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ1000
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
67
incredible zoom range (25-400mm 16.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
has tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Panasonic FZ1000 Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
quite wide (25mm)
great reach (400mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ1000
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse function
64
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
exports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic FZ1000 Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
66
quite wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes microphone socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-01-10 2014-06-12
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-400mm (16.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 13.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 831 grams (1.83 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 517
Other
Battery life - 360 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DMW-BLC12PP
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $800 $800