Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RZ18 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RZ18 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was released 7 years prior to the RZ18 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax RZ18 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 scores against the RZ18 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Optio RZ18. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax RZ18
E-300 | RZ18 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus E-300
RZ18 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | January 2005 | Newer by 81 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax RZ18
E-300 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ18 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the RZ18.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and RZ18 is 67 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and RZ18.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Pentax RZ18 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 178 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $800 | $210 |