Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3 front
Portability
89
Imaging
54
Features
55
Overall
54

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Sony NEX-3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-C3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was unveiled 6 years prior to the NEX-3 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 grades versus the NEX-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony NEX-3

 E-300 NEX-3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-300

 NEX-3 E-300 
RevealedJune 2010January 2005Newer by 65 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution920k134kSharper display (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3

 E-300 NEX-3 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3 has sizing of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the NEX-3.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and NEX-3 is 67 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and NEX-3.

As you can see, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony NEX-3 will provide extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-3
48
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
72
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Sony NEX-3 Street photography information
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
76
screen tilts
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Sports photography camera
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
52
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Sony NEX-3 Travel photography highlights
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low MP (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
59
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-3
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
68
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging details
Sony NEX-3 Vlogging details
9
no video
27
comes with face detection focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha NEX-3
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha NEX-3
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2005-01-10 2010-06-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 12.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 297 gr (0.65 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 68
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.0
DXO Low light score not tested 830
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $800 $0