Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 II
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M5 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was brought out 6 years earlier than the E-M5 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-400 matches up versus the E-M5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus OM-D E-M5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M5
E-400 | E-M5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus E-400
E-M5 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | September 2006 | More recent by 68 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 215k | Clearer screen (+395k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M5
E-400 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 has sizing of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 vs the E-M5.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and E-M5 is 77 and 81 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and E-M5.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus E-M5 to provide more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2012-04-30 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 425 grams (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 826 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $799 |