Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-10, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was announced 7 years prior to the XZ-10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-400 matches up against the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-400 | XZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-400
XZ-10 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Clearer screen (+705k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-10
E-400 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 comes with external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 and the XZ-10.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and XZ-10 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and XZ-10.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus XZ-10 will offer you more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $428 |