Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax 645Z, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Pro DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 645Z (Medium format) use totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-400 was introduced 8 years prior to the 645Z and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 scores against the 645Z in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Pentax 645Z. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax 645Z
| E-400 | 645Z |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus E-400
| 645Z | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2014 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 92 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 215k | Clearer screen (+822k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax 645Z
| E-400 | 645Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 comes with outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax 645Z has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax 645Z in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 and the 645Z.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and 645Z is 77 and 49 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and 645Z.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Pentax 645Z will produce more detail using its extra 41 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Pentax 645Z | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax 645Z |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2014-04-15 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | PRIME III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8256 x 6192 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 27 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 6 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.85x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/125 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 1550 grams (3.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 101 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | Single | Two |
| Price at launch | $599 | $5,024 |