Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Renewed by Olympus E-410
Sony W650
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Sony W650, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W650 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W650 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-400 was launched 6 years earlier than the W650 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-400 scores against the W650 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W650

 E-400 W650 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus E-400

 W650 E-400 
IntroducedJanuary 2012September 2006More recent by 64 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W650

 E-400 W650 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 and Sony W650 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 against the W650.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and W650 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and W650.

To sum up, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony W650 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Sony W650
46
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
34
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Sony W650 Street photography advice
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W650 as a Sports photography camera
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Sony W650 Travel photography information
49
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition in class (124g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography info
Sony W650 Landscape photography info
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
43
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W650 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
33
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (124 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W650 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W650
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 124g (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $599 $140