Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 front
Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
29
Overall
38

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Sony W800
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
  • 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W800, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and W800 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and W800 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was introduced 8 years earlier than the W800 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W800 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-400 scores against the W800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony W800

 E-400 W800 
Manually focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Olympus E-400

 W800 E-400 
ReleasedFebruary 2014September 2006More recent by 90 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony W800

 E-400 W800 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony W800 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Sony W800 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 vs the W800.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and W800 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and W800.

All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W800 will render greater detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Sony W800 Portrait photography features
45
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
38
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Sony W800 Street photography info
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
65
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography factors
Sony W800 Sports photography factors
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
includes tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography info
Sony W800 Travel photography info
49
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W800 as a Landscape photography camera
44
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
41
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Sony W800 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Sony W800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony W800
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-09-14 2014-02-13
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5152 x 3864
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.2-6.4
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - AVI MPEG4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $599 $90