Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FS42
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40


95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
- Old Model is Olympus E-400
- Successor is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009

Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42: A Detailed Camera Comparison for Everyday Creators and Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera means understanding how it fits your photography style, technical needs, and creative aspirations. In this comparison, we take a deep dive into two entry-level cameras from different eras and manufacturers: the Olympus E-410 DSLR and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 ultracompact. At face value, these cameras might seem worlds apart, but both have carved out niches for photographers on a budget.
With over 15 years testing cameras ranging from pro DSLRs to pocket-friendly point-and-shoots, I’ll walk you through strengths, limitations, and real-world performance markers to help you find the best fit for your photographic journey.
At a Glance: Physicality and Handling
The Olympus E-410 is a compact SLR introduced in 2007 that aims for portability without compromising DSLR capabilities. The Panasonic FS42, a 2009 ultracompact model, targets users who prize carry-everywhere convenience.
Feature | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Compact DSLR | Ultracompact Point & Shoot |
Dimensions (mm) | 130 x 91 x 53 | 98 x 55 x 22 |
Weight (g) | 435 | 132 |
Grip and Ergonomics | DSLR-style grip, some physical controls | Minimalist pocketable design |
Despite their label differences, both sport similar 2.5" fixed LCDs but vary widely in physical heft and ergonomics. The E-410’s larger size accommodates a handgrip that aids stability - particularly useful for telephoto or macro work - while the FS42’s slim profile excels for casual shooting or travels where minimal gear weight matters.
Design Philosophy and Control Layout
Handling a camera intuitively improves your ability to seize moments creatively. Let’s look under the hood at button placement, dial availability, and menu navigation.
The Olympus E-410 feels like a traditional DSLR, with dedicated controls for exposure modes, ISO, autofocus selection, and an optical pentamirror viewfinder. Its TruePic III processor supports speedy operation for its time, and the camera offers manual focus as well as aperture and shutter priority modes. These features provide direct control vital for learning the fundamentals of exposure and focus.
The Panasonic FS42’s ultracompact design sacrifices dedicated dials for simplified menus controlled largely through a directional pad and button cluster. Its fixed lens means exposure control is largely automatic without manual aperture or shutter priority modes. While this limits creative control, the camera remains approachable for absolute beginners seeking point-and-shoot ease.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Breakdown
Sensor size and technology heavily influence image quality, dynamic range, and low-light capabilities. Here’s how these two compare technically.
Specification | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix FS42 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | Four Thirds CMOS | 1/2.5" CCD |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 17.3 x 13 | 5.744 x 4.308 |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 224.9 | 24.74 |
Native Resolution | 10 MP | 10 MP |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Max ISO Boost | None | 6400 |
Image Processor | TruePic III | Not specified (basic) |
The E-410’s significantly larger Four Thirds sensor offers access to better image quality, higher dynamic range (measured at DXO’s 10.0 vs. no official FS42 score), and improved control over depth of field. This sensor size is roughly 9 times larger in area than the FS42’s tiny 1/2.5" CCD sensor, translating into clearer, less noisy images - especially in challenging lighting.
The FS42, while sporting a similar resolution count, relies on a smaller sensor prone to higher noise and limited highlight and shadow retention. However, it does offer ISO boost up to 6400, something the E-410 lacks, which can be useful for certain low-light snaps but comes at cost of noise.
Viewing Experience: Optical Viewfinder vs LCD Only
Framing and composition tools differ greatly between these cameras.
- Olympus E-410: Optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.46x magnification. This viewfinder provides a near-real-world view of scenes, which many photographers prefer for its clarity and ability to work well in bright conditions where LCDs can struggle.
- Panasonic FS42: No viewfinder; composition relies solely on its 2.5” fixed LCD with 230k dots. This is typical for ultracompacts but can challenge you in direct sunlight and saps battery life.
The E-410’s combination of optical viewfinder and LCD offers flexibility. For long shooting sessions, the viewfinder reduces eye strain and allows better stability. Panasonic’s FS42 is simpler, but its LCD-dependent composition makes it more suitable for casual capture scenarios.
Autofocus Performance and Shooting Speeds
Autofocus (AF) and burst shooting can make or break action and wildlife photography.
Feature | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix FS42 |
---|---|---|
AF System | 3-point phase-detection | Contrast-detection |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Multi-area | Single only |
Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 2 fps |
AF Face Detection | No | No |
The E-410 shines with its 3-point phase-detection AF system, providing swift and reliable focus, particularly for moving subjects. Though modest by today’s standards, it supports continuous AF tracking - helpful for novices experimenting with moving subjects, sporting events, or wildlife.
The FS42’s contrast-detection AF is slower and less reliable, particularly in low light or busy scenes, and no continuous AF is available. Burst mode at 2 fps limits capturing rapid action.
If wildlife or sports photography is on your radar, the E-410 will be more responsive and rewarding.
Zoom and Lens Versatility
Lens compatibility and zoom range dictate creative freedom.
- Olympus E-410: Employs Four Thirds lens mount, offering access to over 45 Olympus and third-party lenses (mostly prime and zoom). This system gives you the ability to customize your gear for wide-angle landscapes, telephoto wildlife, or macro photography.
- Panasonic FS42: Fixed 33-132 mm f/2.8-5.9 lens with 4x optical zoom. Suitable for casual everyday use but unable to change for specialized photography types.
Access to interchangeable lenses makes the E-410 a better learning tool and future-proof option. Meanwhile, the FS42’s zoom suffices for snapshot-style travel and street photography when portability is king.
Real-World Image Samples
To see their practical output side-by-side, here are representative images captured on both cameras in moderate daylight.
- Notice the E-410’s richer color depth, sharper details, and better tonal transitions.
- FS42 images are pleasant but show more softness and reduced dynamic range.
This demonstrates why sensor size coupled with processor and lens quality profoundly impacts photographer satisfaction.
Handling in Various Photography Genres
Now we’ll analyze how each camera suits popular photographic disciplines:
Portrait Photography
Skin tones are a tough test of color fidelity and smooth bokeh.
- Olympus E-410: Larger sensor and interchangeable lenses enable creamy background separation and better control over depth of field. Eye detection is absent, but manual focus aids precision.
- Panasonic FS42: Small sensor produces deep depth of field, making isolation harder. Fixed lens not ideal for creative portraits.
Winner for portraits: Olympus E-410.
Landscape Photography
Landscape demands high resolution, weather sealing, and wide angle capabilities.
- Olympus E-410: Offers better dynamic range to handle shadow/highlight contrast and interchangeable wide-angle lenses.
- Panasonic FS42: Decent resolution but limited sensor dynamic range; no weather sealing or RAW.
Winner for landscapes: Olympus E-410.
Wildlife and Sports
Fast autofocus and high burst rate essential here.
- Olympus E-410: Offers moderate burst speed and phase-detect AF ideal for tracking animals.
- Panasonic FS42: Slow AF and burst rate limit action photography.
Winner for wildlife/sports: Olympus E-410.
Street Photography
Discretion and portability help seize candid moments.
- Olympus E-410: Larger size may hinder stealth but optical viewfinder helps.
- Panasonic FS42: Pocketable, quiet operation.
Winner for street: Panasonic FS42.
Macro Photography
Requires close focusing and stabilization.
- Olympus E-410: Supported by specialized macro lenses, manual focus, and tripod compatibility.
- Panasonic FS42: 5cm macro focus range, but limited lens flexibility.
Winner for macro: Olympus E-410.
Night and Astrophotography
Raise ISO sensitivity and sensor noise control are critical.
- Olympus E-410: Native ISO up to 1600 with decent noise handling.
- Panasonic FS42: High ISO boost to 6400 exists but noise likely excessive.
Winner for low light: Olympus E-410.
Video Capabilities
- Olympus E-410: No video recording.
- Panasonic FS42: Basic VGA video (640×480 max), 30fps, Motion JPEG.
Simple video suitability leans toward FS42, but neither provide advanced features for modern videographers.
Travel and Everyday Use
Weight, battery life, and size matter here.
- Olympus E-410: Heavier, larger, but versatile lenses.
- Panasonic FS42: Ultra-compact, easy to carry, simple operation.
Winner for travel: Panasonic FS42.
Professional Workflows
- Olympus E-410: RAW support essential for professional post-processing.
- Panasonic FS42: No RAW, limited file control.
Winner for pros: Olympus E-410.
Durability, Build Quality, and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera offers weather sealing or shock proofing, reflecting their budget categories.
Build quality on the Olympus E-410 feels more solid with a metal alloy chassis and professional ergonomics. The FS42 uses plastic construction typical of compact cameras, appropriate for casual, light use.
Connectivity and Storage
Feature | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic FS42 |
---|---|---|
Storage Media | Compact Flash, xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC Cards, Internal Memory |
USB Port | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Wireless Features | None | None |
HDMI/Audio Ports | None | None |
Modern connectivity options are missing on both, so file transfer relies on USB or card readers.
Battery Life and Endurance
Neither camera specification provides detailed battery life data, but:
- Olympus E-410’s DSLR design generally allows for hundreds of shots per charge due to optical viewfinder.
- Panasonic FS42’s LCD-only operation can drain battery faster despite smaller sensor demands.
Consider carrying spares for extended sessions regardless.
Pricing and Value Assessment
Taking into account current market tendencies, both cameras represent budget options with tradeoffs.
- Olympus E-410, though older, offers greater creative and technical flexibility, suitable for learners and enthusiasts stepping into DSLRs.
- Panasonic FS42 targets casual photographers seeking simple, portable capture without the learning curve.
Model | Approximate Launch Price | Value Proposition Summary |
---|---|---|
Olympus E-410 | Mid-range for 2007 | Better optics, sensor, manual controls |
Panasonic FS42 | Entry-level for 2009 | Ultra-portability, ease of use, basic photography |
Summarizing the Scores and Overall Performance
From DXO scores and feature sets, the Olympus E-410 clearly outperforms the FS42 in imaging capabilities, autofocus, and professional features.
Specialty Genre Performance Ratings
This infographic highlights Olympus E-410’s edge across portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and macro photography, while Panasonic FS42 scores best in travel and street discretely.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera is Right for You?
-
Choose the Olympus E-410 if:
- You seek to learn photography fundamentals with manual controls.
- Interchangeable lens versatility matters.
- You are interested in portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or macro work.
- RAW image capture and post-processing are important to you.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 if:
- You prioritize ultracompact size and weight for travel or casual street photography.
- You want a simple, point-and-shoot camera without manual exposure complexity.
- Video capture, albeit basic, is a bonus.
- Budget is tight and you need a camera to easily carry every day.
Both these cameras occupy distinct roles: the Olympus E-410 bridges beginners and enthusiasts ready to experiment creatively, while the Panasonic FS42 excels as a pocket-friendly alternative when convenience beats customization.
Getting the Most Out of Your Camera
Whichever path you take, I recommend:
- For Olympus E-410 users: invest in a quality lens kit and get hands-on with manual modes; experimenting with aperture and shutter speed will broaden your skills dramatically.
- For Panasonic FS42 users: learn to optimize shooting conditions, make use of scene modes, and consider supplemental lighting or tripods for tricky environments.
Remember, no camera substitutes for practice, so grab your camera, hit the streets or nature, and explore what your creative eyesight can reveal.
Ready to Dive In?
Explore product reviews and sample images to familiarize yourself further. Check out local camera stores for hands-on trials or rent these models to experience firsthand how they fit your style.
Photography is a journey where choice enriches creativity - let these insights guide you towards your next great image.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2007-06-14 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | - | $580 |