Olympus E-420 vs Sony WX10
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


95 Imaging
38 Features
38 Overall
38
Olympus E-420 vs Sony WX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-168mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 161g - 95 x 54 x 23mm
- Released January 2011

Olympus E-420 vs Sony WX10: A Hands-On Expert’s Take on Two Very Different Cameras
When it comes to choosing your next camera, diving into the specs alone only tells half the story. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras across genres - from gritty street snaps to meticulous macro shoots - I’ve learned that understanding how a camera performs in the wild (not just on paper) is what truly matters.
Today, I’m unpacking two cameras that couldn’t be more different in form and function: the classic Olympus E-420, a charming entry-level DSLR from 2008, and the compact Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 from 2011, a pocket-friendly point-and-shoot powerhouse. Both appeal to photographers on tight budgets (cheapskates, unite!), but target very different use cases.
Over the next few thousand words, we'll explore how they stack up in technical prowess, handling, and real-world shooting scenarios across photography genres. Plus, I’ll share candid verdicts on which type of shooter should consider which camera. So, buckle up - it’s going to be an insightful ride.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
Let’s start by comparing the size and physical feel, because trust me, lugging or pocketing a camera is a dealbreaker.
The Olympus E-420 is a compact SLR that still carries that classic DSLR heft and grip - 130 x 91 x 53 mm and 426 grams. It’s surprisingly lightweight for a DSLR but maintains a solid feel. With a comfortable hand grip and well-arranged buttons, it caters to those used to holding something substantial. If you’re accustomed to DSLRs or plan on using interchangeable lenses extensively, the E-420’s form factor is friendly to your thumbs and trigger fingers, especially during long shooting sessions.
The Sony WX10, on the other hand, is the camera for days when you want to go utterly pocket-sized. At 95 x 54 x 23 mm and just 161 grams, it slips into a jeans pocket without complaint. The compact design means the controls are minimalist, with fewer physical buttons - great for quick snaps but potentially limiting for those who want manual control at their fingertips. Its ultra-slim profile makes it an unobtrusive companion for street or travel photography.
Both cameras have fixed rear LCD screens - more on that below - but while the E-420’s dials and buttons feel like a club for your thumbs, the WX10 opts for minimalism and simplicity.
Looking at the top controls, the difference in design philosophies is clear.
Olympus’s DSLR comes with dedicated mode dials and metering options, giving serious shooters direct access to exposure modes like shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual. Sony’s WX10 offers manual focus and basic exposure compensation, but shutterspeed/aperture priority modes are absent, reflecting its ease-of-use focus.
Bottom line on build/ergonomics: The E-420 suits traditional shooters who prize tactile controls and the flexibility of lenses, while the WX10 is perfect for those wanting a stylish grab-and-go camera, sacrificing some control for convenience.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Image quality often boils down to sensor size, resolution, and image processor efficiency. Let’s pit the Olympus E-420’s Four Thirds sensor against the WX10’s tiny 1/2.3-inch sensor.
The E-420’s Four Thirds CMOS sensor measures 17.3 x 13 mm, yielding roughly 225 mm² surface area, while the WX10’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor clocks in at just 6.17 x 4.55 mm (about 28 mm²) - a sevenfold difference in sensor real estate. This matters because larger sensors capture more light, translate to lower noise at high ISO, and have better dynamic range.
The Olympus edges with a native 10-megapixel resolution, translating to 3648 x 2736-pixel images, versus Sony’s higher 16 MP (4608 x 3456 pixels), but with the tiny sensor, that extra resolution can’t compensate for increased noise and lower image quality under challenging light.
This balance is evident in DxOMark scores (Olympus E-420 scored 56 overall), while the WX10 hasn't been DXO tested, likely due to its small sensor category.
Real-world takeaway:
- The E-420 delivers cleaner images with better color depth (21.5 bits compared to unknown but likely lower for the WX10).
-
The WX10’s BSI-CMOS tech helps somewhat in low light but it’ll struggle with noise and dynamic range, particularly in shadows and highlights.
Olympus’s TruePic III processor supports respectable noise control and color fidelity for its era. In contrast, Sony’s BIONZ engine prioritizes speed and compact camera features but cannot match the DSLR’s image quality ceiling.
If ultimate image quality in stills is your top priority, the Olympus E-420 takes the win hands-down, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light work.
Seeing Clearly: Viewfinders and LCD Screens
Image composition is crucial, and each camera’s way of framing the shot differs significantly.
The Olympus E-420 has a classical Pentamirror optical viewfinder with roughly 95% frame coverage and 0.46x magnification, offering an eye-level, lag-free preview. While not the brightest or highest magnification, it serves well for day-to-day shooting, especially with moving subjects.
The Sony WX10 skips a viewfinder entirely, relying solely on its rear LCD - a decision that streamlines the body but sacrifices the eye-level experience.
Both cameras sport fixed LCD screens but differ in size and resolution:
- E-420: 2.7-inch screen with 230k dots.
- WX10: Slightly larger 2.8-inch screen with crisp 460k dots Clear Photo LCD Plus technology.
Sony’s LCD is noticeably sharper and brighter, excellent for reviewing shots in bright outdoor conditions - a real plus for street or travel photographers who often shoot on the go without viewfinders.
Olympus’s screen feels more dated and lower resolution, but its presence complements the optical viewfinder nicely, especially for live view and menu navigation.
For photographers who prefer composing with their eye, the E-420’s viewfinder is crucial, while those comfortable composing on the go with a screen only will appreciate Sony’s more vibrant display.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Action
Autofocus (AF) performance can cripple or elevate your shooting experience, especially mid-action or in wildlife and sports photography.
The Olympus E-420 employs a 3-point autofocus system combining contrast detection and phase detection. These days, that sounds modest, and candidly it is. Manual focus and basic AF tracking are available, but holding fast-moving subjects in tacky autofocus can be a headache.
Sony WX10 compensates with 9 AF points using contrast-detection autofocus only, focusing more on simplicity than speed. It lacks continuous AF, which makes tracking moving subjects problematic.
Burst rates and shutter speeds vary too:
- E-420 can shoot at 4 fps up to buffer limits; max shutter speed 1/4000s.
- WX10 caps shooting at a speedy 10 fps, but shutter range tops out at 1/1600s.
The WX10’s faster burst rate suits casual action shooting like kids or pets, though AF lag remains a challenge. Olympus’s slower burst rate and limited AF points make it less ideal for professional wildlife or sports shooters, but better for disciplined portrait or landscape work where focus precision beats speed.
Lens Flexibility and Macro Capabilities
One huge distinction: the E-420 is a Micro Four Thirds system camera with an interchangeable lens mount. Olympus users have access to a vast lens ecosystem, including macro, telephoto, and prime options. This benefits photographers wanting precise control on bokeh, focal lengths, and image quality.
On the flip side, the Sony WX10 features a fixed 24-168 mm zoom lens (7x zoom) with a reasonably bright f/2.4-5.9 aperture. For a compact, that’s a commendable range, and the lens includes optical stabilization - a critical feature for handheld shooting. Macro capabilities extend down to 5 cm, suitable for casual close-ups but nothing a serious macro enthusiast could rely on.
If shooting macros or creative shallow depth-of-field portraits is on your bucket list, Olympus with a dedicated macro or fast prime lens will outperform the WX10’s built-in zoom in image quality and focusing precision.
Real-Life Photography Tests: How Do They Compare Across Genres?
Having handled both cameras in my testing routines, here’s an honest breakdown across popular photography types:
Portrait Photography
- Olympus E-420: With good lenses, it delivers natural skin tones and pleasing bokeh, aided by its larger sensor. Eye detection AF is not present, but manual focus and precise AF points aid composition.
- Sony WX10: Small sensor means less background blur and noisier images in dim light. The built-in lens struggles with sharpness wide-open but does fine for casual portraits in bright light.
Landscape Photography
- E-420’s larger sensor + RAW support = better dynamic range, detail, and post-processing latitude.
- WX10’s sensor limitations and JPG-only workflow reduce flexibility; however, its wide zoom range is handy for varied compositions.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Neither camera is ideal; Olympus’s limited AF system hampers fast focus, and low burst rate constrains action capture. Telephoto lens options improve wildlife shots but add bulk.
- Sony’s fast burst is tempting but poor tracking AF and small sensor hurt image quality.
Street Photography
- WX10 shines with discretion, pocket-size, and quick ready-to-shoot feel; decent zoom range for flexibility.
- E-420 bulkier and slower to react, but its viewfinder aids composition in bright urban environments.
Macro Photography
- E-420 with dedicated macro glass offers focus precision and shallow depth-of-field advantages.
- WX10’s macro mode fine for casual use but limited by small sensor and lens.
Night and Astro Photography
- E-420’s larger sensor and native ISO 100-1600 range allow better noise control; manual exposure modes help capture star trails when paired with a tripod.
- WX10 limited by smaller sensor size; noise significantly worse at high ISOs.
Video Capabilities
- Olympus E-420 does not support video recording.
- Sony WX10 offers Full HD 1080p video at 60fps with optical image stabilization, making it usable for casual videographers.
Travel Photography
- WX10’s pocketability, versatile zoom, and video capabilities suit travelers wanting a lightweight combo.
- E-420’s weight and bulk limit spontaneity, but image quality and lens flexibility reward those willing to carry it.
Professional Workflows
- Olympus supports RAW files and integrates with established MFT lens ecosystems - better for workflow and post-processing.
- Sony shoots JPEG only, limiting professional use beyond casual or online sharing.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
Neither camera caters heavily to modern wireless connectivity.
Olympus E-420 relies on USB 2.0, uses CompactFlash and xD cards, and boasts a decent battery life of approximately 500 shots on a full charge - a plus for long days.
Sony WX10 offers HDMI output and Eye-Fi card compatibility for limited wireless upload but no Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. Storage is via SD/Memory Stick cards. Battery life figures are sparse but generally moderate; compact cameras usually fall short of DSLRs.
Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses
Olympus E-420 Pros:
- Larger Four Thirds sensor yields better image quality and low light handling
- Interchangeable Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem
- Classic DSLR ergonomics with dedicated controls
- RAW image support for flexible editing
- Good battery life
Olympus E-420 Cons:
- Outdated autofocus system with only 3 points
- Low-res and small LCD screen
- No video capabilities
- Bulkier and heavier than compacts
- No built-in stabilization
Sony WX10 Pros:
- Compact and pocketable with lightweight body
- Versatile 7x optical zoom lens with optical IS
- Full HD video recording at 60fps
- Sharp, bright 2.8" LCD screen suitable for outdoor use
- Fast continuous shooting mode (10 fps)
Sony WX10 Cons:
- Tiny 1/2.3” sensor limits image quality, especially in low light
- No RAW support; image editing flexibility limited
- No viewfinder, only LCD composition
- Modest manual controls and basic autofocus system
- Limited battery life and fewer physical controls
The sample images further confirm our analysis: Olympus photos show better dynamic range and color depth, while Sony’s output is noisier but vibrant in daylight.
Overall Performance Ratings and Genre Scores
While the Olympus E-420 rates higher overall in image quality and versatility, the Sony WX10’s strengths lie in portability and video, filling different niches.
Olympus excels at portraits, landscapes, and controlled shooting situations. Sony’s compact size scores high on street and travel photography convenience.
Who Should Buy Which? Practical Recommendations
Choose the Olympus E-420 if:
- You want better image quality, especially for portraits, landscapes, or controlled shooting.
- You desire the flexibility of interchangeable lenses (macro, telephoto, primes).
- You prioritize RAW shooting and editing freedom.
- You don’t mind a bit of bulk and slower burst rates.
- You’re a beginner or enthusiast who wants to learn DSLR basics affordably.
Choose the Sony WX10 if:
- You need a highly portable, pocketable camera with good zoom reach.
- Video recording is important alongside stills.
- You want quick snapshots on the go with minimal fuss.
- You shoot mostly in good lighting and don’t need RAW.
- Your budget is low and you want a solid entry compact.
Final Thoughts: Two Roads, Two Cameras, Both Valuable
In the grand scheme, the Olympus E-420 and Sony WX10 serve fundamentally different photographic journeys. The former is a DSLR classic punching above its weight on image quality and system expandability, the latter a slick compact offering convenience and video in a tidy package.
Neither will win awards against today’s modern mirrorless giants, but they hold nostalgic and educational value - especially for photographers stepping up from cellphone cameras or those on tight budgets who still want solid results.
If your heart pulls toward learning photographic craft with versatile glass and quality images, the Olympus E-420 remains a respectable choice. Meanwhile, if you prize spontaneity, pocketable size, and casual versatility, the Sony WX10 doesn’t disappoint.
I hope this deep dive helps you navigate the tradeoffs and decide which camera fits your photo-life best.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-420 vs Sony WX10 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-168mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.8 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 161 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 54 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $999 | $200 |