Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus VH-515 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VH-515, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-500 was brought out 7 years earlier than the VH-515 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-500 matches up against the VH-515 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus VH-515

 E-500 VH-515 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-500

 VH-515 E-500 
RevealedAugust 2012October 2005Newer by 83 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VH-515

 E-500 VH-515 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VH-515 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 against the VH-515.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and VH-515 is 70 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and VH-515.

As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-515 will resolve more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography info
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography info
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
27
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
Olympus VH-515 Street photography factors
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has touch to focus
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Olympus VH-515
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
32
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography info
Olympus VH-515 Travel photography info
52
lighter than others (479 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
has touch to focus
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography factors
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
37
rather wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
35
rather wide (26mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus VH-515
 Olympus E-500Olympus VH-515
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus VH-515
Alternative name EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2012-08-21
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lbs) 152 grams (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $600 $648