Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") use totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was introduced 13 years before the ZS200 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-500 scores vs the ZS200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-500 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-500
ZS200 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | October 2005 | Fresher by 149 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 215k | Sharper display (+1025k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS200
E-500 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-500 against the ZS200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and ZS200 is 70 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and ZS200.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide greater detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $600 | $800 |