Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4947f/4947fb87fbec47ca46c132a07069d33ec1864a0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH5 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH5 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the FH5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH5 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-500 scores vs the FH5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FH5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH5
E-500 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Olympus E-500
FH5 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 63 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH5
E-500 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 offers outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FH5 has proportions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 and the FH5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff24/7ff245870b0f1af74d7c714d49c8f64fd8b3cd3c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FH5 is 70 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8ff9/f8ff9c077de08e04e583affd24bc591a8c32a35c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FH5.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH5 will offer more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65959/659595f3c91563576f879b9a2df5cea12b450824" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a4f/b8a4f8d604b4e0e679483fd7839c9ade5ab95c75" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH5 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FS18 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $600 | $169 |