Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-500 and Pentax Q-S1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-500 matches up versus the Q-S1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-500 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-500
Q-S1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2014 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 106 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax Q-S1
E-500 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 has external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 and Pentax Q-S1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 against the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d814c/d814c411b6744e2eacbe4118b13fd924028ca175" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and Q-S1 is 70 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfcf6/dfcf677516586efccb3188f95a2ea6d674f6f359" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and Q-S1.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Pentax Q-S1 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caf94/caf94b965a604fe1c422c822042994d41053cb61" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b59d/3b59d53a6b00fd967c64812e1d738610ce792ded" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 203 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $600 | $250 |