Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released November 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-510
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus SZ-12, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-510 was released 5 years before the SZ-12 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-510 scores vs the SZ-12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-510 & Olympus SZ-12. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus SZ-12
E-510 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-510
SZ-12 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2007 | Newer by 50 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus SZ-12
E-510 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-12 has sizing of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus SZ-12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-510 compared to the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61a3/c61a386c1beda4cbad9d6270b470be355ecbc146" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and SZ-12 is 69 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/317ee/317eee4a24ef3f2e4ea9cb1805d35686f697308b" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and SZ-12.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SZ-12 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-510 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69c03/69c03cfe2ad35cdbe7c40e2e1d35a384aa014709" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a82/a3a82b8b15ec48c3c7667b5190ec1279b00d1ea2" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Olympus SZ-12 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2007-11-23 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 gr (1.08 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $550 | $350 |