Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc9/47cc9bc94afeaa31cc3dde1b811c34d098a7d562" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed November 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-510
- Superseded the Olympus E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS40
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS45, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-510 was released 8 years earlier than the ZS45 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-510 scores versus the ZS45 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-510 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-510
ZS45 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | ![]() | November 2007 | Newer by 86 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic ZS45
E-510 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 features physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS45 has sizing of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS45 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-510 against the ZS45.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4ba1/a4ba128d7ed8ad81200065b9af5f55eca01b6ee2" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and ZS45 is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04eb7/04eb7ca10ce4f0bc4b6baae3dbe2e7acc6f37e37" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and ZS45.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS45 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-510 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68187/681872348168d49f26794e03531b4bd32433faea" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5add/e5addff8f7164807a7f9d60bd1cb57eaa87703c6" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2007-11-23 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 gr (1.08 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $550 | $300 |