Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 7 years prior to the E-PL6 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-520 matches up against the E-PL6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-PL6
E-520 | E-PL6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus E-520
E-PL6 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 72 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-PL6
E-520 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL6 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-520 compared to the E-PL6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d025/5d025988802e0045face3e1480285a4c97930d76" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and E-PL6 is 68 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77de3/77de3ca7614c8ab61303472df3e0197747adeccb" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and E-PL6.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus E-PL6 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6616e/6616e13cf38807d96ee2d3fbacc298da4b5ec21c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94778/947788b7e8fdb7038d93cb61bdf15cb9bd67d172" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2014-08-01 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 325 grams (0.72 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $300 |