Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VG-120, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 3 years before the VG-120 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-520 grades vs the VG-120 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 and Olympus VG-120. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VG-120
E-520 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-520
VG-120 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 28 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VG-120
E-520 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-120 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VG-120 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 and the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49fd/e49fd4d3eeb296aedc799cd3eaa538a08e60956c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and VG-120 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deb6c/deb6c42074970843552ab37a928586955de21fb6" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and VG-120.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VG-120 will render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c113b/c113b016ca0416f8cef179cfdb94091014ce707a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f459/2f459d0fc422866183cc583320fbdc3ec8b80d04" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus VG-120 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 160 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $190 |