Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-520 was manufactured 3 years before the VR-320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-520 scores against the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-520 VR-320 
Focus manually More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-520

 VR-320 E-520 
RevealedJuly 2011August 2008Fresher by 35 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VR-320

 E-520 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 provides exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 vs the VR-320.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and VR-320 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and VR-320.

Clearly, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
58
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery life (650 shots)
has phase detect AF
max fps low (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
52
good battery life (650 shots)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography info
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography info
57
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (650 per charge)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging info
9
no video
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than others (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus E-520Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus VR-320
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2008-08-20 2011-07-19
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 grams (1.22 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $400 $179