Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2959/b2959208e447dba4f569f63d7fd2c62d2a4ed005" alt="Pentax K-x front Pentax K-x front"
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced December 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the K-x (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and K-x (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was released 16 months earlier than the K-x which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-520 scores versus the K-x in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-x. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax K-x
E-520 | K-x |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus E-520
K-x | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2009 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-x
E-520 | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Pentax K-x has specifications of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 compared to the K-x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38a78/38a7832a5dc9a30422045fa3c41541c8b84dc624" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and K-x is 68 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85bf7/85bf7f24c7b028ea3834d721c15a69a5cdfc2f5d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and K-x.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax K-x will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d666/7d666e47798908fea9d416412a41604241b3b4f9" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e9f/62e9f39293497fe9b017655d3c67d6d57ad4352e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-x Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-x |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2009-12-23 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 16.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 580 grams (1.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | 811 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 1900 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $400 | $600 |