Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-520 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was unveiled 22 months before the HZ35W making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-520 matches up against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Samsung HZ35W
E-520 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-520
HZ35W | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | August 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Samsung HZ35W
E-520 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 has physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 against the HZ35W.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and HZ35W is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Samsung HZ35W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $300 |