Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Alternative Name is WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-520 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-520 was unveiled 22 months before the HZ35W making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-520 matches up against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-520 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-520

 HZ35W E-520 
RevealedJune 2010August 2008More modern by 22 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-520 HZ35W 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 has physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 against the HZ35W.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and HZ35W is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and HZ35W.

To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
58
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
34
has manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Street photography factors
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Sports photography camera
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great battery (650 shots)
supports phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography highlights
52
great battery (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Landscape photography camera
57
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
great battery (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
43
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
9
no video shooting
31
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus E-520Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-520 Samsung HZ35W
Otherwise known as - WB650
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2008-08-20 2010-06-16
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $400 $300