Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Introduced November 2011
  • Renewed by Sony A68
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-520 was brought out 4 years earlier than the A65 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-520 scores versus the A65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony A65

 E-520 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-520

 A65 E-520 
IntroducedNovember 2011August 2008More modern by 39 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony A65

 E-520 A65 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the A65.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and A65 is 68 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and A65.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A65 will render extra detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A65 as a Portrait photography camera
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
77
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
Sony A65 as a Street photography camera
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
77
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography details
Sony A65 Sports photography details
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery (650 per charge)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
81
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A65 as a Travel photography camera
52
good battery (650 CIPA)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
68
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Sony A65
58
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
good battery (650 CIPA)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse recording
75
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lack of Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging features
Sony A65 Vlogging features
9
can't record video
78
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony A65
 Olympus E-520Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-520 Sony SLT-A65
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2008-08-20 2011-11-15
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 622 gr (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 74
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light rating 548 717
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 560 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $400 $700