Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Renewed by Sony A68
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-520 was brought out 4 years earlier than the A65 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-520 scores versus the A65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony A65
E-520 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-520
A65 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | August 2008 | More modern by 39 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony A65
E-520 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the A65.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and A65 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and A65.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A65 will render extra detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 622 gr (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 560 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $700 |