Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c093a/c093ae2117bb68c7c1561b0f622d9b6a9250e7ec" alt="Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-600 was announced 17 months before the SZ-10 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-600 scores against the SZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Olympus SZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus SZ-10
E-600 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus E-600
SZ-10 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus SZ-10
E-600 | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has specifications of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-600 against the SZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e3a/48e3a9b4e08986b547da89cb75c90700e6bab97b" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and SZ-10 is 71 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e1f/08e1fcbf156fb870fae0f5dc0ca625be838f56b4" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and SZ-10.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-600 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus SZ-10 will produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-600 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bfb2/4bfb2b2c923ec57390d50303d85401c5a910aea4" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d50a0/d50a0eb9f3d519bb9c48f26484e1b514df937819" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus SZ-10 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-30 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 7.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $300 |