Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-600 front
 
Olympus SZ-16 iHS front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Olympus SZ-16 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
  • Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-600 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the SZ-16 iHS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-600 grades versus the SZ-16 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-600 SZ-16 iHS 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-600

 SZ-16 iHS E-600 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013August 2009More modern by 40 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-600 SZ-16 iHS 
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 features outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has sizing of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 vs the SZ-16 iHS.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and SZ-16 iHS is 71 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and SZ-16 iHS.

Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-600 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will render greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-600 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-600 Portrait photography factors
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Portrait photography factors
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
35
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-600
Street photography with Olympus SZ-16 iHS
76
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (226 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SZ-16 iHS as a Sports photography camera
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 CIPA)
42
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 Travel photography details
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Travel photography details
53
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (500 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
65
lighter than competition (226 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography info
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Landscape photography info
53
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
41
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery (220 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-600
Vlogging with Olympus SZ-16 iHS
18
can't shoot video
31
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition (226 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
 Olympus E-600Olympus SZ-16 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-600 Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-08-30 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 7 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 515 grams (1.14 lb) 226 grams (0.50 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 541 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 220 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $230