Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-600 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Launched August 2009
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-600 was manufactured 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-600 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-600 XZ-2 iHS 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-600

 XZ-2 iHS E-600 
LaunchedDecember 2012August 2009Newer by 40 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-600 XZ-2 iHS 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-600 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and XZ-2 iHS is 71 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and XZ-2 iHS.

Plainly, both the cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-600 comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-600
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
46
you can focus manually
has face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
76
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors (346g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 CIPA)
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
great battery power (340 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
53
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
61
great battery power (340 CIPA)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (346g)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography info
53
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
55
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-600 Vlogging factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging factors
18
can't shoot video
36
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external microphone socket
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors (346 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus E-600Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-600 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-08-30 2012-12-18
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 7 35
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 515 gr (1.14 lb) 346 gr (0.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 49
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 11.3
DXO Low light rating 541 216
Other
Battery life 500 images 340 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $450