Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-600 was manufactured 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-600 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-600 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-600 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-600
XZ-2 iHS | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | August 2009 | Newer by 40 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-600 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-600 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and XZ-2 iHS is 71 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-600 comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-08-30 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 340 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $450 |