Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
50 Imaging
75 Features
52 Overall
65
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Released March 2010
- Renewed by Pentax 645Z
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax 645D, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Pro DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and 645D (40MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and 645D (Medium format) feature different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-600 was unveiled 6 months earlier than the 645D and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax 645D being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-600 scores vs the 645D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Pentax 645D. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Pentax 645D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax 645D
E-600 | 645D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645D over the Olympus E-600
645D | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax 645D
E-600 | 645D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | March 2010 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Pentax 645D has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") and a weight of 1480 grams (3.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax 645D in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-600 versus the 645D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and 645D is 71 and 50 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and 645D.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Pentax 645D will offer more detail having an extra 28 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax 645D Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Pentax 645D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Pentax 645D |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro DSLR |
Launched | 2009-08-30 | 2010-03-10 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 40 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 7264 x 5440 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Total lenses | 45 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lb) | 1480 grams (3.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 24.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | 1262 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 800 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Launch cost | $0 | $4,000 |