Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-600 and Pentax WG-2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-600 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WG-2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-600 matches up versus the WG-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-600 and Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax WG-2
E-600 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-600
WG-2 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 29 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax WG-2
E-600 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-600 and Pentax WG-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-600 and the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/924bc/924bc95e40b7bc7152c1274fadd84752af32adf3" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and WG-2 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84e1c/84e1cd155f07a72c245917d0e877771f6fa28535" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and WG-2.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-600 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-2 will give greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-600 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16804/168047376c278b15fb3a1299c21d223f349e1779" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60342/60342a4bf6695cdeb418e64b0cb5195e4ded731e" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-08-30 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 260 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $350 |