Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
![Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-600.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T99/Sony-T99-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Released July 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-600 versus Sony T99, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the T99 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and T99 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The E-600 was introduced 10 months prior to the T99 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-600 scores against the T99 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony T99
E-600 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus E-600
T99 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony T99
E-600 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Sony T99 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-600 versus Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-600 versus the T99.
![Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-600-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T99-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and T99 is 71 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-600-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T99-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and T99.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-600 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony T99 will result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-600 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-600-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T99-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-600-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T99-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-600 vs Sony T99 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-08-30 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $179 |