Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-620 was brought out 6 months prior to the FH3 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 scores against the FH3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FH3
E-620 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-620
FH3 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH3
E-620 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same age |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FH3 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-620 versus the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/303ad/303ad5a207c4fc780fec93cb85f818e2c6a9c5e6" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FH3 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c77e/8c77e529e45bcab23f05efeb2c9aee675935a03b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and FH3.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FH3 will show more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7bf8/d7bf86184d8900e8b5c17d07f88feeb9ef1f5da2" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e598/1e59825f2d6c4842cdcb8a509e1d7e00e1b899d8" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $799 | $160 |