Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13746/13746b655510dbf858df8e35d753589370ec8925" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FP2, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-620 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the FP2 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-620 grades vs the FP2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FP2
E-620 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-620
FP2 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FP2
E-620 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same age |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FP2 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FP2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 versus the FP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d3ea/0d3ea77a796cd14db78971cadf996c2ab83e8326" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and FP2 is 71 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a3c/63a3c6becf4f987e1a62d95b7b3a058c7247aa03" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and FP2.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-620 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daede/daedeede21d2fc5934a6dc741c95dd6af3d0a777" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4736/f4736a9f85b913a51b96a468392e05ab55ac1603" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $799 | $80 |