Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced November 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the CX6 (10MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4000 was announced 3 years earlier than the CX6 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the CX6 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh CX6
| FE-4000 | CX6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Olympus FE-4000
| CX6 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 28 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX6
| FE-4000 | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 provides exterior dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh CX6 has specifications of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 vs the CX6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and CX6 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and CX6.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus FE-4000 to render more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX6 |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $595 |