Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-M5 (16MP) is relatively close but the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and E-M5 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The FE-4030 was unveiled 3 years prior to the E-M5 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FE-4030 matches up against the E-M5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus OM-D E-M5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-M5
FE-4030 | E-M5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus FE-4030
E-M5 | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 28 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M5
FE-4030 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 comes with external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 has dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the FE-4030 and the E-M5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0651b/0651bf85800cda67f97486f0af27a281f280cbf5" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and E-M5 is 95 and 81 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bee9/3bee914bdaabc29322a97c2cf3a96dae82b7c0f3" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and E-M5.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4030 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M5 will result in extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/420b3/420b30b5244f39b53c3e29b0aafbcd40bf0a9b0d" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e3d6/7e3d68a4608ebe70e21cf09b992b95c27ea52f34" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-04-30 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 pounds) | 425 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 826 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $130 | $799 |