Clicky

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30
Olympus FE-4030 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2010
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh CX2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The FE-4030 was manufactured 5 months after the CX2 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the FE-4030 scores vs the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh CX2

 FE-4030 CX2 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus FE-4030

 CX2 FE-4030 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh CX2

 FE-4030 CX2 
RevealedJanuary 2010August 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4030 offers physical dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-4030 vs the CX2.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and CX2 is 95 and 93 respectively.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and CX2.

Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus FE-4030 to show more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-4030
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
28
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
25
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Street photography features
Ricoh CX2 Street photography features
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography highlights
34
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Travel photography information
Ricoh CX2 Travel photography information
65
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
66
lighter than others in class (185g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (9MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography factors
32
pretty wide (26mm)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
42
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Vlogging details
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging details
25
pretty wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
30
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus FE-4030Ricoh CX2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-4030 Ricoh CX2
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-01-07 2009-08-20
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Max aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 146 gr (0.32 lbs) 185 gr (0.41 lbs)
Physical dimensions 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $130 $341