Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) come with different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was unveiled 7 years before the E-M10 II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FE-5020 grades vs the E-M10 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FE-5020 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus FE-5020
E-M10 II | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | July 2009 | More recent by 74 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M10 II
FE-5020 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 vs the E-M10 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and E-M10 II.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Alternative name | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $160 | $499 |