Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PL2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-PL2 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was unveiled 18 months earlier than the E-PL2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the FE-5020 grades versus the E-PL2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus PEN E-PL2. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-PL2
FE-5020 | E-PL2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus FE-5020
E-PL2 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PL2
FE-5020 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 has external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has specifications of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PL2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 against the E-PL2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and E-PL2 is 95 and 85 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and E-PL2.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The FE-5020 has the smaller sensor which will make obtaining bokeh trickier. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Also referred to as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 362g (0.80 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $160 | $0 |