Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-5020 was introduced 7 months later than the SL102 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-5020 grades versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung SL102
FE-5020 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | January 2009 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus FE-5020
SL102 | FE-5020 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung SL102
FE-5020 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 versus the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and SL102.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus FE-5020 to show greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer FE-5020 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | X-935 | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $160 | $130 |