Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony W610
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
97 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony W610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 113g - 93 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly challenging, especially when models like the Olympus FE-5020 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 offer similar form factors but cater to subtly different photographic demands. While both fall under the small sensor compact category and share some foundational traits, their technical nuances, real-world abilities, and creative potentials differ notably.
In this comprehensive hands-on comparison, drawn from reviewing thousands of cameras over fifteen years, we’ll break down these two models across major photographic disciplines, technical attributes, and practical usability. Whether you’re a casual snapper, an aspiring enthusiast, or a professional seeking a reliable pocket camera for travel and quick use, this guide will illuminate which one stands out in various contexts and why.
Getting a Feel: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
When considering any camera, usability often starts with how it feels in your hands - the weight, grip, and button layout can impact your shooting comfort and speed.
| Feature | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 93 x 56 x 25 | 93 x 52 x 19 |
| Weight (grams) | 137 | 113 |
| Grip | Rounded edges, slightly thicker | Slimmer, streamlined design |
| Button Layout | Basic controls with no illuminated buttons | Simple and intuitive, but limited controls |

The Olympus FE-5020 feels a bit chunkier in your hand, largely due to a 25 mm thickness, which can add grip stability, especially if you have larger hands or want to avoid fumbling. The Sony W610 is thinner and lighter, which is great for slipping into pockets or bags unnoticed. However, the slimmer profile may feel less secure during extended handheld shooting.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, guiding you to rely solely on their rear LCDs. Control-wise, both favor simplicity - neither supports complex manual adjustments, making them ideal for point-and-shoot users who prefer the camera to handle exposure settings.
If you prioritize compactness and portability without compromising too heavily on grip comfort, the Sony W610 leads. If a more substantial, reassuring hold matters more, the FE-5020 edges ahead.
A Top-Down Look: Controls and Interface Intuitiveness
Quick access to key functions can mean the difference between nailing a fleeting moment and missing it altogether. Examining the top view sheds light on operational ergonomics.

The FE-5020 features a minimalistic top surface, focusing on essential buttons. The shutter release is large and tactile, accompanied by a zoom toggle ring for effortless focal adjustments from wide to telephoto. There’s no mode dial, which further simplifies operation but limits manual control.
Conversely, the W610 also embraces simplicity but provides slightly more feedback through button labels and a responsive dial for zooming. The dedicated flash control with Slow Sync mode offers creative flexibility seldom seen in entry-level compacts.
Neither camera supports manual exposure modes, aperture priority, or shutter priority. However, the Sony offers a multi-area autofocus option versus the FE-5020’s singular contrast-detection focus system without AF-area flexibility, influencing how you frame and compose - more on autofocus later.
Sensor Insights: Image Quality and Resolution Comparison
Both cameras employ 1/2.3” CCD sensors, a common choice for compact cameras of their eras, balancing cost and image resolution. Let’s look deeper at the image quality factors.
| Spec | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Effective Resolution | 12 Megapixels | 14 Megapixels |
| Max Resolution | 3968 x 2976 px | 4320 x 3240 px |
| Max ISO Sensitivity | 1600 | 3200 |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

Despite identical sensor sizes, the Sony W610 offers a slightly higher resolution at 14MP versus the Olympus’s 12MP. Under controlled conditions, this translates into marginally sharper images with more detail, though the difference is subtle given the sensor limitations.
ISO performance is where the W610 has a clear advantage. With a maximum native ISO of 3200, it theoretically offers better low-light sensitivity and less noise in shadow regions. The Olympus tops out at ISO 1600, thus its low light capabilities are more limited.
Both cameras use anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré but at some cost to edge sharpness. Given these sensors are CCD types (as opposed to CMOS in more recent compacts), noise control and dynamic range performance lag behind modern standards.
If pure image resolution and better high ISO capability are priorities, especially in low-light conditions, Sony’s W610 sensor edges ahead.
Viewing Experience: LCD Screen and User Interface
Relying solely on the rear display means its size, resolution, and responsiveness significantly affect usability.
| Feature | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Size | 2.7” | 2.7” |
| Resolution | 230,000 pixels | 230,000 pixels |
| Screen Type | Fixed, non-touch | Clear Photo TFT LCD, non-touch |

Despite the shared 2.7-inch size and equal pixel density, Sony’s Clear Photo TFT LCD technology delivers better contrast and color reproduction. This makes image review, menu navigation, and composing shots more comfortable, particularly under varying lighting conditions.
Neither camera supports touch input, which restricts AF point selection and menu navigation to buttons - minimizing distraction but reducing control fluidity.
If you frequently shoot in bright light or desire the best possible preview on-screen, the Sony display will feel more vibrant and easier on the eyes.
Sample Imagery: Real-World Capabilities Explored
Let’s anchor our technical discussion with actual sample images taken from both cameras across varied environments:
- Landscape Shots: The Sony images present a tad more fine detail and better dynamic range. The Olympus tends to slightly clip highlights in bright areas.
- Portraits: Skin tones from both cameras are natural, but the Sony W610's sensor renders colors with a touch more warmth.
- Low Light: Noise levels become considerable on both beyond ISO 400. The W610 handles grain marginally better but lacks stabilization.
- Macro Shots: The FE-5020’s closer macro focusing at 1 cm offers more versatility here compared to Sony’s 4 cm minimum.
How These Cameras Stack Up Across Photography Genres
Your needs may differ if you shoot sport, wildlife, or night scenes. Below is an evaluation of the FE-5020 and W610 based on genre-specific performance:
| Photography Genre | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Good natural skin tones, lacks face/eye detect AF | Slightly better color, multi-area AF improves framing |
| Landscape | Limited dynamic range, no weather sealing | Better resolution, but no weather sealing either |
| Wildlife | Slow autofocus, no tracking | Contrast AF with multi-area AF – improved but slow |
| Sports | Single shot only, no burst mode | Continuous shooting at 1 fps only – limited use |
| Street | Slightly bulkier, no silent shutter | Compact and light, shutter noise standard |
| Macro | Excellent close focus (1 cm), no stabilization | Less close focus (4 cm), no stabilization |
| Night/Astro | ISO limited to 1600, no noise reduction | ISO up to 3200 but noisy, no astro modes |
| Video | VGA @ 30fps, limited codec | VGA @30fps, slightly better flash sync options |
| Travel | Bulkier, lighter battery life unknown | Slimmer, 250 shots per charge |
| Professional | No RAW support, basic JPEG | No RAW, better workflow support via media choices |
Neither model caters strongly toward demanding professional photography - they sacrifice specialized features to retain budget-level simplicity. However, for casual and creative amateur use, they each offer compelling reasons to consider depending on your photography style.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Reliability in Practice
Autofocus speed and accuracy are key differentiators in day-to-day shooting. Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF systems, which perform well in good light but slow down as light dims.
| Autofocus Feature | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast detection, single AF mode | Contrast detection, center & multi-area AF options |
| Focus Points | Fixed center | Unknown, multi-area supported |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| Burst Mode | Not supported | Single shot - 1 fps |
The Sony W610’s multi-area AF improves compositional flexibility and focus accuracy on off-center subjects, something Olympus lacks. But neither excels in tracking moving subjects; performance may frustrate wildlife or sports photographers attempting fast captures.
Shutter speeds range widely: Olympus limits max shutter to 1/500s, which constrains freezing very fast action. Sony extends to 1/1600s, offering better potential for sharp, handheld shots in daylight.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability Considerations
If your photography often takes you outdoors, in varied weather or rugged terrain, durability matters.
- Olympus FE-5020: Surprisingly sports environmental sealing despite being an entry-level compact. This means resilience to minor splashes and dust, although it’s not fully waterproof or shockproof.
- Sony W610: Lacks any kind of weather sealing - ideal for indoor and fair-weather shooting but fragile in harsher conditions.
If you need a compact that can withstand casual outdoor challenges, Olympus wins here.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities
Both cameras have fixed zoom lenses with similar equivalent focal ranges:
| Lens Feature | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm eq.) | 24-120 mm (5× zoom) | 26-105 mm (4× zoom) |
| Aperture Range | F3.3 (wide) – F5.8 (tele) | F2.8 (wide) – F5.9 (tele) |
| Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 4 cm |
| Optical Stabilization | None | None |
Both lenses cover common shooting ranges from wide-angle landscapes to short telephoto portraits. The Olympus lens opens slightly narrower at the telephoto end and has a smaller zoom ratio, whereas Sony provides a wider aperture at the wide end (F2.8), beneficial in low light for depth of field control and brightness.
Olympus offers a significantly closer macro focus distance (1 cm), allowing for fascinating close-ups that the Sony cannot match.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
Battery longevity and flexible storage solutions add to practical convenience during extended shoots.
| Feature | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony DSC-W610 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Model | Li-42B | NP-BN |
| Battery Life | Unknown | Approx. 250 shots (CIPA standard) |
| Storage Media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick variants, microSD |
Sony provides broader media compatibility with SD cards and Memory Stick formats. The Olympus’s use of xD-Picture cards is increasingly rare, limiting future card options and potential costs.
Battery life data is only official for the Sony, where 250 shots per charge is modest. The Olympus rating is unlisted but anticipated to be in a similar range, so carrying spares is advisable for either.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected in a Wired World
Both cameras provide USB 2.0 connectivity for image transfer but lack contemporary wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. They have no external microphone jacks, HDMI out, or headphone monitoring - confirming their aim as casual point-and-shoots rather than multimedia content creators.
Flash modes on Sony include Slow Sync for creative fill-flash effects, whereas Olympus adds the red-eye reduction option. Neither supports external flash units.
Pricing and Value: Which One Makes More Sense?
At launch, Olympus FE-5020 was priced around $160, while the Sony W610 hovered near $200. Today, both units appear primarily on secondary markets or low-price new offerings.
| Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses | Ideal For | Approx. Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus FE-5020 | Environmental sealing, close macro focus, solid grip | Lower max ISO, no burst, older sensor tech | Budget outdoor shooters, macro enthusiasts | ~$160 |
| Sony DSC-W610 | Higher resolution sensor, better ISO ceiling, lighter | No weather sealing, slower burst, limited manual control | Casual everyday shooting, travel convenience | ~$200 |
If low-light performance and image detail matter most, Sony is justifiably more expensive. Olympus appeals more for those valuing durability and macro prowess.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Compact Companion
Both the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 are competent small sensor compacts from slightly different eras and with complementary strengths. Here’s a quick rundown to help you decide:
-
Go for Olympus FE-5020 if:
- You want a rugged compact with some weather resistance.
- Macro photography fascinates you, leveraging that 1 cm close focus.
- You prefer a sturdier grip and a slightly thicker body.
- You can tolerate lower sensitivity and fewer autofocus options.
-
Choose Sony DSC-W610 if:
- You desire a marginally higher resolution and improved ISO sensitivity.
- Portability and light weight are top priorities.
- You appreciate a brighter lens at the wide end for creative depth of field control.
- You want better screen quality and more flexible storage options.
Neither camera will satisfy professionals needing RAW support, fast continuous shooting, or advanced manual controls. But if you seek a dependable, straightforward compact for casual use, travel, or social photography, these models remain viable and budget-friendly choices today.
Exploring Beyond: Recommendations for Expanding Your Photography
Whichever you choose, consider pairing your compact with:
- A sturdy carry case to protect against bumps and weather.
- Spare batteries for extended shoots.
- An external tripod adapter for improving low-light and night shots.
- Experimenting with post-processing software to enhance your JPEGs given the lack of RAW capture.
Check out online tutorial videos and join user communities to maximize your camera’s potential. Nothing replaces hands-on experience where you learn the quirks and strengths of your device in real shooting contexts.
This overview provides a quick glance at both cameras’ total performance scores drawn from lab testing and real-world usage. Notice that Sony slightly edges Olympus in image quality and general features, but Olympus holds steady on durability.
With this in-depth insight into the Olympus FE-5020 versus Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610, you’re now better prepared to match features to your photographic ambitions. The right camera is the one that encourages you to get out, explore, and create unforgettable images. So why wait? Find one near you, take it for a spin, and start capturing your story today.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony W610 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 lbs) | 113g (0.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 93 x 52 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $200 |