Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Launched August 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 IV, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was announced 4 years before the E-M10 IV which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the E-M10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 E-M1 II E-M10 IV 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-M10 IV E-M1 II 
LaunchedAugust 2020September 2016Newer by 47 months
Screen resolution1040k1037kClearer screen (+3k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 IV

 E-M1 II E-M10 IV 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 IV has proportions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II against the E-M10 IV.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-M10 IV is 68 and 81 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and E-M10 IV.

To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images but you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography advice
75
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
77
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than average (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
84
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography advice
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery power (350 shots)
72
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
72
lighter than average (574g)
environment proofing
includes touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
84
has bluetooth
comes with touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography info
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
has double storage slots
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
82
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 IV
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has mic port
lighter than average (574 grams)
78
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 IV
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus OM-D E-M10 IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2016-09-19 2020-08-04
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW format
Min boosted ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 121
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.62x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 8.7 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 7.20 m (at ISO 200)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 383 grams (0.84 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 360 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots 2 One
Retail cost $1,700 $699