Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was introduced 6 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the E-P2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-P2
E-M1 II | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | April 2010 | Fresher by 79 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-P2 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P2
E-M1 II | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-P2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the E-P2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-P2 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-P2.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to result in more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-04-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $799 |