Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Revealed April 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was introduced 6 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the E-P2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-P2

 E-M1 II E-P2 
RevealedSeptember 2016April 2010Fresher by 79 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-P2 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P2

 E-M1 II E-P2 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-P2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the E-P2.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-P2 is 68 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-P2.

As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to result in more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography highlights
76
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW files
60
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features focus by touch
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
bad battery power (350 shots)
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather proofing
features focus by touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (350 shots)
43
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery (300 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography factors
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
bad battery power (350 shots)
60
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging factors
79
selfie friendly display
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic support
lighter than competition in class (574g)
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P2
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus PEN E-P2
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2016-09-19 2010-04-22
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 56
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.4
DXO Low light score 1312 505
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 300 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Dual 1
Pricing at launch $1,700 $799