Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SP-620 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
  • 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
  • Announced January 2012
  • Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the SP-620 UZ which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SP-620 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-M1 II SP-620 UZ 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016January 2012More modern by 58 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SP-620 UZ E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-M1 II SP-620 UZ 
Display size3"3"Same display sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SP-620 UZ.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SP-620 UZ is 68 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SP-620 UZ.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-620 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
75
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
34
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Olympus SP-620 UZ Street photography info
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than others (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography factors
Olympus SP-620 UZ Sports photography factors
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect AF
bad battery power (350 CIPA)
48
long zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
72
lighter than others (574g)
environment proofing
comes with touch to focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery power (350 CIPA)
61
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (525mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-620 UZ Landscape photography features
76
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
2 card slots
bad battery power (350 per charge)
41
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus SP-620 UZ
79
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have microphone support
lighter than others (574 grams)
28
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-620 UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SP-620 UZ
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SP-620 UZ
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-525mm (21.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-5.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1500s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 435 grams (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Dual 1
Launch pricing $1,700 $199