Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the SP-620 UZ which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SP-620 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1 II | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 58 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II
SP-620 UZ | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M1 II | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SP-620 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43d9e/43d9e713a5597c05fae2a9557c748e10fc1a811d" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SP-620 UZ is 68 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38312/38312084c387a873466a6804a7989ef1b9bd5569" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SP-620 UZ.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30975/30975c07adbe9fc8c1389b8a6112b2c19297e242" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0a4b/e0a4b0dd0d8c7314b40036ae822fff9a57f782a1" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1500s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $199 |